Paper · 2023 · Melioration and Water Management

Productivity of spring barley during irrigation in the conditions of the Northern Caspian Sea

Victor Sychev; Victor Shevchenko; Natalia Tyutyuma; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The article presents the results on the effect of various soil treatments and doses of mineral fertilizers on the productivity of spring barley under irrigation conditions on light chestnut soils of the Northern Caspian. Studies have revealed that the greatest yield increases were obtained when using the working organ of the ROPA – 0,32–0,49 t / ha, as well as when applying mineral fertilizers at a dose of N150P150K150 – 3,91–4,08 t /ha. In absolute terms, the highest yield of barley grain was provided on the variant with deep loosening of the soil with a ROP tool (h = 0,4–0,45 m) with a dose of fertilizers N150P150K150 – 7,64 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ROPA working organ gave the greatest yield increases of 0,32–0,49 t / ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
working organ of the ROPAe0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
0,32–0,49 t / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest yield increases were obtained when using the working organ of the ROPA – 0,32–0,49 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of spring barley during irrigation in the conditions of the Northern Caspian Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150P150K150 fertilizer gave yield increases of 3,91–4,08 t /ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
mineral fertilizers at a dose of N150P150K150e0
Outcome
Productivityt0
Value
3,91–4,08 t /hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when applying mineral fertilizers at a dose of N150P150K150 – 3,91–4,08 t /ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of spring barley during irrigation in the conditions of the Northern Caspian Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosening with ROP and N150P150K150 produced the highest grain yield, 7,64 t/ha.

Treatment
deep loosening of the soil with a ROP tool (h = 0,4–0,45 m) with a dose of fertilizers N150P150K150e0
Outcome
yield of barley graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7,64 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield of barley grain was provided on the variant with deep loosening of the soil with a ROP tool (h = 0,4–0,45 m) with a dose of fertilizers N150P150K150 – 7,64 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–639 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.