Abstract
An investigation on the influence of Atonic Growth Regulatory Substances and coconut water immersion on the growth and yield of shallots was conducted from March 3 to May 9 in 2023, in Tawangrejo Village, Ngrambe, Ngawi. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of different doses of ZPT Atonik and coconut water on the growth and yield of shallots (Allium ascalonicum L). The experiment was designed using a Completely Randomized Block Design (RAKL), which included two factorials. The first factorial was the level of coconut water immersion concentration (K), consisting of four levels, namely K0 = 0%, K1 = 80%, K2 = 90%, and K3 = 100%. The second factor in this study is Atonik (A), which consists of four levels: A1 = 0 ml/l, A1 = 1.5 ml/l, A2 = 3.0 ml/l, and A3 = 4.5 ml/l. Each experiment in this study will be repeated three times and comprise four treatment levels, resulting in a total of 16 treatment combinations. We analyzed the data using Analysis of Variety followed by the Honest Significant Difference Test (BNJ) at the 5% level. The study results revealed that the Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g), but had a significant effect on the observed parameter of plant height (41.33 cm).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion had no significant effect on shallot leaf number (40.30).
- Taxon
- shallots
Allium cepa var. aggregatume1 - Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
- Value
- 40.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g)”
e1“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion had no significant effect on shallot tuber number (17.87).
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume1
- Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione0
- Outcome
- number of tuberse0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
- Value
- 17.87e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g)”
e1“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion had no significant effect on shallot tuber diameter (2.45 cm).
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume1
- Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione0
- Outcome
- tuber diametere0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
- Value
- 2.45 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g)”
e1“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion had no significant effect on shallot fresh weight (130.63 g).
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume1
- Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione0
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
- Value
- 130.63 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g)”
e1“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion had no significant effect on shallot dry weight (109.22 g).
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume1
- Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
- Value
- 109.22 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion did not have a significant effect on the observed parameters of the number of leaves (40.30), number of tubers (17.87), tuber diameter (2.45 cm), fresh weight (130.63 g), and dry weight (109.22 g)”
e1“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik and coconut water immersion significantly affected shallot plant height (41.33 cm), with direction unstated.
- Taxon
- shallotsAllium cepa var. aggregatume2
- Treatment
- Atonik treatment and coconut water immersione1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Value
- 41.33 cme0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but had a significant effect on the observed parameter of plant height (41.33 cm)”
e1“Atonik treatment and coconut water immersion”
e2“shallots (Allium ascalonicum L)”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
127 papers more in this group
See all 131 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.