Paper · 2023 · Plant Methods

RGB image-based method for phenotyping rust disease progress in pea leaves using R

Salvador Osuna-Caballero; Tiago Olivoto; Manuel A. Jiménez-Vaquero; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rust is a damaging disease affecting vital crops, including pea, and identifying highly resistant genotypes remains a challenge. Accurate measurement of infection levels in large germplasm collections is crucial for finding new resistance sources. Current evaluation methods rely on visual estimation of disease severity and infection type under field or controlled conditions. While they identify some resistance sources, they are error-prone and time-consuming. An image analysis system proves useful, providing an easy-to-use and affordable way to quickly count and measure rust-induced pustules on pea samples. This study aimed to develop an automated image analysis pipeline for accurately calculating rust disease progression parameters under controlled conditions, ensuring reliable data collection. RESULTS: A highly efficient and automatic image-based method for assessing rust disease in pea leaves was developed using R. The method's optimization and validation involved testing different segmentation indices and image resolutions on 600 pea leaflets with rust symptoms. The approach allows automatic estimation of parameters like pustule number, pustule size, leaf area, and percentage of pustule coverage. It reconstructs time series data for each leaf and integrates daily estimates into disease progression parameters, including latency period and area under the disease progression curve. Significant variation in disease responses was observed between genotypes using both visual ratings and image-based analysis. Among assessed segmentation indices, the Normalized Green Red Difference Index (NGRDI) proved fastest, analysing 600 leaflets at 60% resolution in 62 s with parallel processing. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient between image-based and visual pustule counting showed over 0.98 accuracy at full resolution. While lower resolution slightly reduced accuracy, differences were statistically insignificant for most disease progression parameters, significantly reducing processing time and storage space. NGRDI was optimal at all time points, providing highly accurate estimations with minimal accumulated error. CONCLUSIONS: A new image-based method for monitoring pea rust disease in detached leaves, using RGB spectral indices segmentation and pixel value thresholding, improves resolution and precision. It rapidly analyses hundreds of images with accuracy comparable to visual methods and higher than other image-based approaches. This method evaluates rust progression in pea, eliminating rater-induced errors from traditional methods. Implementing this approach to evaluate large germplasm collections will improve our understanding of plant-pathogen interactions and aid future breeding for novel pea cultivars with increased rust resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A method automatically estimates pustule and leaf area parameters.

Outcome
pustule number, pustule size, leaf area, and percentage of pustule coveragee0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“The approach allows automatic estimation of parameters like pustule number, pustule size, leaf area, and percentage of pustule coverage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1231 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method reconstructs leaf time series and disease progression parameters.

Outcome
disease progression parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“It reconstructs time series data for each leaf and integrates daily estimates into disease progression parameters, including latency period and area under the disease progression curve.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease response varied significantly among pea genotypes using visual and image analysis.

Outcome
variation in disease responsese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variation in disease responses was observed between genotypes using both visual ratings and image-based analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1543 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NGRDI analyzed 600 leaflets at 60% resolution in 62 seconds.

Outcome
analysing 600 leafletse0
Direction
fasteste0
Value
62 se0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the Normalized Green Red Difference Index (NGRDI) proved fastest, analysing 600 leaflets at 60% resolution in 62 s with parallel processing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1721 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Image and visual pustule counts had concordance above 0.98.

Outcome
accuracye0
Value
over 0.98e0
Comparator
visual pustule countinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Lin's concordance correlation coefficient between image-based and visual pustule counting showed over 0.98 accuracy at full resolution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1857 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower image resolution slightly reduced accuracy, without significant differences for most progression measures.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
lower resolutione0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“While lower resolution slightly reduced accuracy, differences were statistically insignificant for most disease progression parameters, significantly reducing processing time and storage space.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–2051 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower resolution reduced processing time and storage space.

Outcome
processing time and storage spacee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reducing processing time and storage space.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2051 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NGRDI was optimal at all time points with high accuracy and little accumulated error.

Outcome
highly accurate estimations with minimal accumulated errore0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“NGRDI was optimal at all time points, providing highly accurate estimations with minimal accumulated error.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2159 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method was more accurate than other image approaches and comparable to visual methods.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
highere0
Value
hundreds of imagese0
Comparator
other image-based approachese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“It rapidly analyses hundreds of images with accuracy comparable to visual methods and higher than other image-based approaches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2355–2482 · show in text ↑