Paper · 2023 · Ecology

Soil microbes mediate the effects of resource variability on plant invasion

Xue Zhang; Mark van Kleunen; Chunling Chang; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A fundamental question in ecology is which species will prevail over others amid changes in both environmental mean conditions and their variability. Although the widely accepted fluctuating resource hypothesis predicts that increases in mean resource availability and variability therein will promote nonnative plant invasion, it remains unclear to what extent these effects might be mediated by soil microbes. We grew eight invasive nonnative plant species as target plants in pot-mesocosms planted with five different synthetic native communities as competitors, and assigned them to eight combinations of two nutrient-fluctuation (constant vs. pulsed), two nutrient-availability (low vs. high) and two soil-microbe (living vs. sterilized) treatments. We found that when plants grew in sterilized soil, nutrient fluctuation promoted the dominance of nonnative plants under overall low nutrient availability, whereas the nutrient fluctuation had minimal effect under high nutrient availability. In contrast, when plants grew in living soil, nutrient fluctuation promoted the dominance of nonnative plants under high nutrient availability rather than under low nutrient availability. Analysis of the soil microbial community suggests that this might reflect that nutrient fluctuation strongly increased the relative abundance of the most dominant pathogenic fungal family or genus under high nutrient availability, while decreasing it under low nutrient availability. Our findings are the first to indicate that besides its direct effect, environmental variability could also indirectly affect plant invasion via changes in soil microbial communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fluctuation promoted nonnative plant dominance in sterilized soil with low nutrient availability.

Taxon
nonnative plantse0
Treatment
nutrient fluctuatione0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
low nutrient availabilitye0
Comparator
sterilized soile0

Verbatim

e0

“when plants grew in sterilized soil, nutrient fluctuation promoted the dominance of nonnative plants under overall low nutrient availability, whereas the nutrient fluctuation had minimal effect under high nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fluctuation had minimal effect on dominance in sterilized soil with high nutrient availability.

Taxon
nonnative plantse0
Treatment
nutrient fluctuatione0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
minimal effecte0
Qualifier
high nutrient availabilitye0
Comparator
sterilized soile0

Verbatim

e0

“when plants grew in sterilized soil, nutrient fluctuation promoted the dominance of nonnative plants under overall low nutrient availability, whereas the nutrient fluctuation had minimal effect under high nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fluctuation promoted nonnative plant dominance in living soil with high nutrient availability.

Taxon
nonnative plantse0
Treatment
nutrient fluctuatione0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
high nutrient availabilitye0
Comparator
living soile0

Verbatim

e0

“when plants grew in living soil, nutrient fluctuation promoted the dominance of nonnative plants under high nutrient availability rather than under low nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fluctuation increased dominant pathogenic fungal abundance at high nutrient availability.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
nutrient fluctuatione0
Interactor
pathogenic fungal family or genuse0pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of the most dominant pathogenic fungal family or genuse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
high nutrient availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient fluctuation strongly increased the relative abundance of the most dominant pathogenic fungal family or genus under high nutrient availability, while decreasing it under low nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant invasion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient fluctuation decreased dominant pathogenic fungal abundance at low nutrient availability.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
nutrient fluctuatione0
Interactor
pathogenic fungal family or genuse0pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of the most dominant pathogenic fungal family or genuse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
low nutrient availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient fluctuation strongly increased the relative abundance of the most dominant pathogenic fungal family or genus under high nutrient availability, while decreasing it under low nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant invasion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑