Paper · 2023 · New Valley Journal of Agricultural Science

Statistical Estimation of the Production and Cost Functions of Sugar Cane Crop in Minia Governorate

Hala Ali

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study the productivity and economic indicators of sugar cane production in Egypt and the Minia Governorate. It also aimed to estimate the statistical functions of physical production in order to assess the economic efficiency of the main resources used in sugar cane production within the study sample. Additionally, statistical estimation of cost functions was conducted to obtain indicators of the economic efficiency of sugar cane production. The research yielded several results, among the most important of which were: through estimating the production function of sugar cane in the DeirMawas center, it was found that production factors account for approximately 72% of the variations in sugar cane production quantity in the study sample. The significance of the seedlings variable (Q2) and the nitrogen fertilizer variable (Q4) were established, as their coefficients were statistically significant with the dependent variable, while the significance of the other variables was not established. The production elasticity of the seedlings element (Q2) was approximately 0.507, which means that a 10% increase in the use of this production factor leads to a 5.07% increase in sugar cane production. The total elasticity of the function was approximately 1.45, indicating that these factors operate within the range of increasing returns to scale. The results also indicated that the most significant problems and obstacles faced by sugar cane producers in the Minia Governorate during the 2021/2022 agricultural season were primarily related to the high prices of fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production factors account for approximately 72% of the variation in sugar cane production quantity in the study sample.

Taxon
sugar canee1
Treatment
production factorse1
Outcome
variations in sugar cane production quantitye1
Value
approximately 72%e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“production factors account for approximately 72% of the variations in sugar cane production quantity in the study sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–776 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seedlings variable (Q2) had a statistically significant coefficient with sugar cane production.

Taxon
sugar canee2
Treatment
seedlings variable (Q2)e1
Outcome
dependent variablee1
Setting
DeirMawas centere2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The significance of the seedlings variable (Q2) and the nitrogen fertilizer variable (Q4) were established, as their coefficients were statistically significant with the dependent variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–966 · show in text ↑
e2

“the production function of sugar cane in the DeirMawas center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–636 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen fertilizer variable (Q4) had a statistically significant coefficient with sugar cane production.

Taxon
sugar canee2
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer variable (Q4)e1
Outcome
dependent variablee1
Setting
DeirMawas centere2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The significance of the seedlings variable (Q2) and the nitrogen fertilizer variable (Q4) were established, as their coefficients were statistically significant with the dependent variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–966 · show in text ↑
e2

“the production function of sugar cane in the DeirMawas center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–636 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10% increase in the use of the seedlings production factor leads to a 5.07% increase in sugar cane production.

Taxon
sugar canee3
Treatment
seedlings element (Q2)e4
Outcome
sugar cane productione3
Direction
increasee3
Value
5.07%e3
Qualifier
a 10% increase in the use of this production factore3

Verbatim

e3

“a 10% increase in the use of this production factor leads to a 5.07% increase in sugar cane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1235 · show in text ↑
e4

“The production elasticity of the seedlings element (Q2) was approximately 0.507”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The production elasticity of the seedlings element (Q2) was approximately 0.507.

Taxon
sugar canee2
Outcome
production elasticity of the seedlings element (Q2)e4
Value
approximately 0.507e4

Verbatim

e2

“the production function of sugar cane in the DeirMawas center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–636 · show in text ↑
e4

“The production elasticity of the seedlings element (Q2) was approximately 0.507”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total elasticity of the sugar cane production function was approximately 1.45, indicating increasing returns to scale.

Taxon
sugar canee2
Outcome
total elasticity of the functione5
Value
approximately 1.45e5
Qualifier
increasing returns to scalee5

Verbatim

e2

“the production function of sugar cane in the DeirMawas center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–636 · show in text ↑
e5

“The total elasticity of the function was approximately 1.45, indicating that these factors operate within the range of increasing returns to scale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most significant problems faced by sugar cane producers in Minia Governorate in the 2021/2022 season were primarily related to high fertilizer prices.

Taxon
sugar canee6
Outcome
most significant problems and obstacles faced by sugar cane producerse6
Qualifier
primarily related to the high prices of fertilizerse6
Setting
Minia Governorate during the 2021/2022 agricultural seasone6

Verbatim

e6

“The results also indicated that the most significant problems and obstacles faced by sugar cane producers in the Minia Governorate during the 2021/2022 agricultural season were primarily related to the high prices of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1613 · show in text ↑