Paper · 2023 · Summa Phytopathologica

Interactions between temperature and wheat head wetting duration on fusarium head blight intensity

Erlei Melo Reis; Sandra Maria Zoldan; Mateus Zanata

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT In experiments conducted in growth chambers with the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23, interactions between five temperatures (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30°C) and eleven wetting periods were assessed for fusarium head blight (FHB) intensity. Each temperature consisted of one experiment and the wetting hours corresponded to the treatments. The disease occurred even at 10ºC, the minimum tested temperature, and the maximum incidence was at 25oC, both after 50h wetting. Variations in wheat FHB intensity with temperature were explained by the Beta generalized model, and spike wetting duration by the Gompertz model. Disease intensity was modeled according to temperature and wetness duration. The resulting equation represents a description of the response of FHB spikelet incidence to the combined effects of temperature and wetness duration. Since the infection requires a long wetness period, its origin may not be dew but rain, which suggests fungicide application before the occurrence of predicted rain during the wheat predisposition period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium head blight occurred on wheat BR 23 even at 10 C, the minimum tested temperature.

Material
BR 23e0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
The disease occurrede1
Qualifier
10ºC, the minimum tested temperaturee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“The disease occurred even at 10ºC, the minimum tested temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–408 · show in text ↑
e2

“fusarium head blight (FHB) intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum fusarium head blight incidence was at 25 C after 50 h of wetting.

Treatment
25oCe1
Interactor
fusariumFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
incidencee1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
50h wettinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum incidence was at 25oC, both after 50h wetting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–471 · show in text ↑
e2

“fusarium head blight (FHB) intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–242 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Variations in wheat FHB intensity with temperature were explained by the Beta generalized model.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
wheat FHB intensitye0
Qualifier
Beta generalized modele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations in wheat FHB intensity with temperature were explained by the Beta generalized model, and spike wetting duration by the Gompertz model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–618 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Variations in wheat FHB intensity with spike wetting duration were explained by the Gompertz model.

Treatment
spike wetting duratione0
Outcome
wheat FHB intensitye0
Qualifier
Gompertz modele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations in wheat FHB intensity with temperature were explained by the Beta generalized model, and spike wetting duration by the Gompertz model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–618 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The resulting equation describes the response of FHB spikelet incidence to the combined effects of temperature and wetness duration.

Treatment
combined effects of temperature and wetness duratione1
Outcome
FHB spikelet incidencee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of FHB spikelet incidence to the combined effects of temperature and wetness duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–846 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Since infection requires a long wetness period, its origin may be rain rather than dew.

Outcome
infectione1
Qualifier
requires a long wetness period, its origin may not be dew but raine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Since the infection requires a long wetness period, its origin may not be dew but rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–934 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide should be applied before predicted rain during the wheat predisposition period.

Outcome
fungicide application before the occurrence of predicted raine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide application before the occurrence of predicted rain during the wheat predisposition period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1051 · show in text ↑