Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

Sustainable Cropping System Intensification in Arid Region of India: Fallow Replacement with Limited Duration Sorghum–Legume Intercropping Followed by Eruca sativa Mill. Grown on Conserved Soil Moisture

Suresh Pal Singh Tanwar; Panna Lal Regar; Shiv Datt; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to explore the possibilities of sustainable crop intensification in the fallow–Eruca sativa Mill. system in arid ecology by replacing fallow with short-duration sorghum–legume intercropping. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with two planting systems (bed and conventional) in main plots and a factorial combination of crop duration (50 and 60 days) and cropping systems (sole sorghum, sorghum + cowpea, sorghum + Sesbania in 2:2 ratio) in sub-plots. In the succeeding Eruca sativa crop, residuals and two gypsum levels (0 and 250 kg ha−1) were tested. Bed planting practiced during both seasons did not improve the system productivity to significant levels. Extending the duration of fallow replacement crops from 50 to 60 days significantly increased their forage yield, overall system productivity by 25–34%, and system net returns by 15.9–21.5%. Amongst the intercropping systems, the sorghum + Sesbania system added 10–13 tonnes ha−1Sesbania biomass to the soil, resulting in higher soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, dehydrogenase activity, and residual soil moisture, which increased the yield of the succeeding Eruca sativa crop by 8.8–15% compared to the residual of sole sorghum. However, it could not compensate for the yield loss due to the utilization of 50% of the area for growing the green manure crop. The sorghum + cowpea intercropping–Eruca sativa system was found to be the optimum combination with a system productivity of 1.27–1.87 Mg ha−1Eruca sativa seed equivalent. The productivity of Eruca sativa further improved by 9.5–23.7% due to the soil application of gypsum @ 250 kg ha−1. When averaged over treatments, fallow replacement during the rainy season reduced the available soil moisture at the sowing of Eruca sativa by 8.3–22.8% and subsequently its yield by 16.5–30.4% compared to the fallow–Eruca sativa system. However, with this production penalty, an additional rainy-season fodder crop was successfully grown, which improved the system productivity by 57.7–82.8%, net returns by 31.2–57.3%, and rainfall use efficiency from 0.21 to 36 USD/mm−1 ha−1. Hence, it may be concluded that short-duration fodder crops may be taken as fallow replacement crops for higher system productivity and rainfall use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting did not significantly improve system productivity.

Treatment
Bed plantinge0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bed planting practiced during both seasons did not improve the system productivity to significant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eruca sativa Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60-day crop duration increased forage yield relative to 50 days.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
60 dayse0
Outcome
forage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extending the duration of fallow replacement crops from 50 to 60 days significantly increased their forage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer fallow replacement increased system productivity by 25–34%.

Treatment
60 dayse0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25–34%e0
Comparator
50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extending the duration of fallow replacement crops from 50 to 60 days significantly increased their forage yield, overall system productivity by 25–34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eruca sativa Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer fallow replacement increased system net returns by 15.9–21.5%.

Treatment
60 dayse0
Outcome
system net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.9–21.5%e0
Comparator
50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extending the duration of fallow replacement crops from 50 to 60 days significantly increased their forage yield, overall system productivity by 25–34%, and system net returns by 15.9–21.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eruca sativa Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum plus Sesbania residues increased succeeding Eruca sativa yield by 8.8–15%.

Treatment
sorghum + Sesbaniae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.8–15%e0
Comparator
sole sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sorghum + Sesbania system added 10–13 tonnes ha−1Sesbania biomass to the soil, resulting in higher soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, dehydrogenase activity, and residual soil moisture, which increased the yield of the succeeding Eruca sativa crop by 8.8–15% compared to the residual of sole sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum application improved Eruca sativa productivity by 9.5–23.7%.

Treatment
gypsum @ 250 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9.5–23.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity of Eruca sativa further improved by 9.5–23.7% due to the soil application of gypsum @ 250 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1661 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Eruca vesicariaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.