Paper · 2002 · Nigerian Journal of Entomology

Aspects of Insecticidal action of Piper guineense Schum and Thonn fruit powders against Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera:Bruchidae)

T.I. OFUYA; E.O. DAWODU

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Under laboratory conditions (28 ± 3°C and 70 ± 5% r.h.) in Akure, Nigeria, powders of different particle sizes (212 um, 300 um, 500 um and 1 mm, respectively) made from ripe Piper guineense Schum and Thonn fruits, were evaluated at five rates of application (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.50 g/20 g of seed), for insecticidal action against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), a major storage pest of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Treatments involved introducing freshly emerged beetles onto protected and unprotected cowpea seeds in airtight glass tubes or plastic plates. Irrespective of particle size of powder, all rates of application significantly reduced (P < 0.05) oviposition and adult emergence of C. maculatus compared with the control. Similarly, all introduced freshly emerged adult beetles were killed within 36 hours. The susceptibility of adult beetles to P. guineense powder increased significantly with the age of the beetle. Powder of particle size of 212 um was always more potent than powder of particle size of 1mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All powder application rates reduced cowpea pest oviposition relative to control.

Treatment
all rates of applicatione0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
ovipositione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of particle size of powder, all rates of application significantly reduced (P < 0.05) oviposition and adult emergence of C. maculatus compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“a major storage pest of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All powder application rates reduced cowpea pest adult emergence relative to control.

Treatment
all rates of applicatione0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult emergence of C. maculatuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of particle size of powder, all rates of application significantly reduced (P < 0.05) oviposition and adult emergence of C. maculatus compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“a major storage pest of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All introduced adult beetles were killed within 36 hours.

Treatment
powderse1
Interactor
adult beetlese0pest
Outcome
adult beetles were killede0
Value
36 hourse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all introduced freshly emerged adult beetles were killed within 36 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“powders of different particle sizes (212 um, 300 um, 500 um and 1 mm, respectively) made from ripe Piper guineense Schum and Thonn fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–212 · show in text ↑
e2

“a major storage pest of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–430 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult beetle susceptibility to Piper powder increased with beetle age.

Organ / stage
age of the beetlee0
Interactor
adult beetlese0pest
Outcome
susceptibility of adult beetles to P. guineense powdere0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The susceptibility of adult beetles to P. guineense powder increased significantly with the age of the beetle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“storage pest of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 212 um Piper powder was more potent than the 1 mm powder.

Treatment
Powder of particle size of 212 ume0
Outcome
more potente0
Direction
more potente0
Comparator
powder of particle size of 1mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Powder of particle size of 212 um was always more potent than powder of particle size of 1mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“storage pest of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–400 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.