Paper · 2023 · South African Journal of Botany

Understory diversity and forest soil properties in different forest stands in Northern Chhattisgarh, India

Annpurna Devi; Manoj Kumar Jhariya; Dhiraj Kumar Yadav; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study deals with the understory structure, diversity, and soil macro and micronutrients in various forest stands of the Duldula forest in northern Chhattisgarh. Forest stands include four natural (dense, moderately dense, regenerated, and degraded forests) and one plantation (teak). Stratified random sampling methods were used to evaluate the phytosociological attributes of shrubs, climbers, and herbs in various forest stands. Soil samples were analyzed for macro and micronutrients at two different depths (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm). A total of 14 shrubs, 17 climbers, and 30 herb species representing 9, 8, and 12 families, respectively were recorded from various forest stands. The total density value of shrubs, climbers, and herbs ranged between 600 and 1760 individuals ha−1, 320–5240 individuals ha−1, and 356,000–684,000 individuals ha−1, respectively for different forest stands. Shannon index values for shrub, climber, and herb ranged between 0.78–2.88, 1.68–2.45, and 2.57–3.59, respectively. The soil of the study area was found to be acidic in nature with moderate levels of organic carbon (%), macro, and micronutrient status. Considering the total density value of various forests stands highest number of shrubs, climbers, and herbs were recorded in degraded forests which indicates the process of degradation facilitates the growth of understory vegetation in comparison to tree species. In most cases, the soil attributes were higher in dense forests. This, therefore, indicates that sustainable management of the soil is essential for the restoration of degraded forests to a natural condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen shrub, 17 climber and 30 herb species were recorded.

Taxon
shrubse0
Outcome
speciese0
Value
14 shrubse0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 14 shrubs, 17 climbers, and 30 herb species representing 9, 8, and 12 families, respectively were recorded from various forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climber richness was 17 species across stands.

Taxon
climberse0
Outcome
speciese0
Value
17 climberse0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 14 shrubs, 17 climbers, and 30 herb species representing 9, 8, and 12 families, respectively were recorded from various forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herb richness was 30 species across stands.

Taxon
herbe0
Outcome
speciese0
Value
30 herb speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 14 shrubs, 17 climbers, and 30 herb species representing 9, 8, and 12 families, respectively were recorded from various forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub density ranged from 600 to 1760 individuals per hectare.

Taxon
shrubse0
Outcome
total density valuee0
Value
600 and 1760 individuals ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The total density value of shrubs, climbers, and herbs ranged between 600 and 1760 individuals ha−1, 320–5240 individuals ha−1, and 356,000–684,000 individuals ha−1, respectively for different forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climber density ranged from 320 to 5240 individuals per hectare.

Taxon
climberse0
Outcome
total density valuee0
Value
320–5240 individuals ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The total density value of shrubs, climbers, and herbs ranged between 600 and 1760 individuals ha−1, 320–5240 individuals ha−1, and 356,000–684,000 individuals ha−1, respectively for different forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herb density ranged from 356,000 to 684,000 individuals per hectare.

Taxon
herbse0
Outcome
total density valuee0
Value
356,000–684,000 individuals ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The total density value of shrubs, climbers, and herbs ranged between 600 and 1760 individuals ha−1, 320–5240 individuals ha−1, and 356,000–684,000 individuals ha−1, respectively for different forest stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub Shannon diversity ranged from 0.78 to 2.88.

Taxon
shrube0
Outcome
Shannon index valuese0
Value
0.78–2.88e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shannon index values for shrub, climber, and herb ranged between 0.78–2.88, 1.68–2.45, and 2.57–3.59, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climber Shannon diversity ranged from 1.68 to 2.45.

Taxon
climbere0
Outcome
Shannon index valuese0
Value
1.68–2.45e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shannon index values for shrub, climber, and herb ranged between 0.78–2.88, 1.68–2.45, and 2.57–3.59, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herb Shannon diversity ranged from 2.57 to 3.59.

Taxon
herbe0
Outcome
Shannon index valuese0
Value
2.57–3.59e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shannon index values for shrub, climber, and herb ranged between 0.78–2.88, 1.68–2.45, and 2.57–3.59, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degraded forests had the highest density of shrubs, climbers and herbs.

Taxon
shrubs, climbers, and herbse0
Outcome
number of shrubs, climbers, and herbse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
degraded forestse0

Verbatim

e0

“highest number of shrubs, climbers, and herbs were recorded in degraded forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1295 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense forests usually had higher soil attributes.

Outcome
soil attributese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
dense forestse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, the soil attributes were higher in dense forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sustainable soil management to restore degraded forests.

Outcome
restoration of degraded forests to a natural conditione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“sustainable management of the soil is essential for the restoration of degraded forests to a natural condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1625 · show in text ↑