Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Genetic Parameter and Hyper-Parameter Estimation Underlie Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Bread Wheat

Mohammad Bahman Sadeqi; Agim Ballvora; Said Dadshani; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Estimation and prediction play a key role in breeding programs. Currently, phenotyping of complex traits such as nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in wheat is still expensive, requires high-throughput technologies and is very time consuming compared to genotyping. Therefore, researchers are trying to predict phenotypes based on marker information. Genetic parameters such as population structure, genomic relationship matrix, marker density and sample size are major factors that increase the performance and accuracy of a model. However, they play an important role in adjusting the statistically significant false discovery rate (FDR) threshold in estimation. In parallel, there are many genetic hyper-parameters that are hidden and not represented in the given genomic selection (GS) model but have significant effects on the results, such as panel size, number of markers, minor allele frequency, number of call rates for each marker, number of cross validations and batch size in the training set of the genomic file. The main challenge is to ensure the reliability and accuracy of predicted breeding values (BVs) as results. Our study has confirmed the results of bias-variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction error for the ensemble-learning-based model STACK, which has the highest performance when estimating genetic parameters and hyper-parameters in a given GS model compared to other models.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STACK had the highest performance in estimating genetic parameters and hyperparameters relative to other models.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
estimating genetic parameters and hyper-parameterse0
Comparator
other modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ensemble-learning-based model STACK, which has the highest performance when estimating genetic parameters and hyper-parameters in a given GS model compared to other models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study confirmed bias variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction error results for STACK.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
bias-variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction errore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our study has confirmed the results of bias-variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction error for the ensemble-learning-based model STACK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑