Paper · 2023 · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews

Orange-fleshed potato cultivars’ responsiveness to herbicides and weed species interruption in Njala, Moyamba District, Southern Sierra Leone.

Dan David Quee; Marco Daivd Tarawallie; Musa Decius Saffa; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The 2019 and 2020 field experiments were established to evaluate pre-emergence herbicides and weed interruption on orange-fleshed potato cultivars’ productivity. The experiment was executed at the Crop Protection Department trial site, Njala University Campus using a strip-plot design in three replications. Results indicated that Button (Diodia scandens) and Rushfoil (Croton hirtus) broadleaved weed species arose as the utmost predominant weed types that showed 58.52% and 25.68% relative density, respectively. Notwithstanding, Mathuthu orange-fleshed cultivar exhibited maximum weed competitive ability (5.14). The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%). Therefore, application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and supplementary hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting may be acknowledged to farmers as an efficient and cost-effective weed management strategy in orange-fleshed potato cultivars’ productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Button weed had 58.52% relative density.

Interactor
Diodia scandensHexasepalum scandense0weed
Outcome
relative densitye0
Value
58.52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Button (Diodia scandens) and Rushfoil (Croton hirtus) broadleaved weed species arose as the utmost predominant weed types that showed 58.52% and 25.68% relative density, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rushfoil had 25.68% relative density.

Interactor
Croton hirtusCroton hirtuse0weed
Outcome
relative densitye0
Value
25.68%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Croton hirtus
Croton hirtus · InteractorManoj Karingamadathil · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Button (Diodia scandens) and Rushfoil (Croton hirtus) broadleaved weed species arose as the utmost predominant weed types that showed 58.52% and 25.68% relative density, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mathuthu had maximum weed competitive ability of 5.14.

Material
Mathuthue0
Outcome
weed competitive abilitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mathuthu orange-fleshed cultivar exhibited maximum weed competitive ability (5.14)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometraine plus hand weeding gave a maximum herbicide efficiency index of 20.65.

Treatment
Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
herbicide efficiency indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
20.65e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometraine plus hand weeding gave maximum potato yield of 7.04 t ha-1.

Treatment
Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.04 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometraine plus hand weeding gave maximum net field benefit of SLL 2,564.64.

Treatment
Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
net field benefite0
Direction
maximume0
Value
SLL 2,564.64e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometraine plus hand weeding had total variable cost of SLL 2,300.00.

Treatment
Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
total variable coste0
Value
SLL 2,300.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometraine plus hand weeding gave maximum profitability of 113.48%.

Treatment
Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
113.48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting, revealed maximum herbicide efficiency index (20.65), yield (7.04 t ha-1), net field benefit (SLL 2,564.64), total variable cost (SLL 2,300.00) as well as profitability (113.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Prometraine plus hand weeding four weeks after planting for potato weed management.

Outcome
application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and supplementary hand weeding at 4 weeks after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Prometraine (5 L ha-1) and supplementary hand weeding at 4 weeks after planting may be acknowledged to farmers as an efficient and cost-effective weed management strategy in orange-fleshed potato cultivars’ productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1127 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 40 positive, 21 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.