Abstract
This experiment suggests that the utilization of the greengram variety IPM 02-3 is advantageous due to its superiority in terms of performance and adaptability over other varieties investigated. Additionally, application of 50 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O demonstrates comparable performance and profitability to application of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O, making it an economically favourable option. Soil fertility analysis revealed P and K's role in enhancing nutrient dynamics. The relation between soil nutrient levels and greengram yield underscores the multifaceted relationship. In summary, genetic factors, coupled with optimal nutrient management, synergistically affect the growth and yield of greengram.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Greengram variety IPM 02-3 showed superior performance and adaptability over the other varieties investigated.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- IPM 02-3e1
- Outcome
- performance and adaptabilitye1
- Comparator
- other varieties investigatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e1“the utilization of the greengram variety IPM 02-3 is advantageous due to its superiority in terms of performance and adaptability over other varieties investigated”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 50 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O gave performance and profitability comparable to 60 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 50 kg/ha P2O5 and K2Oe2
- Outcome
- performance and profitabilitye2
- Direction
- comparablee2
- Comparator
- 60 kg/ha P2O5 and K2Oe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e2“application of 50 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O demonstrates comparable performance and profitability to application of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and K2O”
Claim · model-written summary
P and K fertilization enhanced soil nutrient dynamics.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- P and Ke3
- Outcome
- nutrient dynamicse3
- Direction
- enhancinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e3“Soil fertility analysis revealed P and K's role in enhancing nutrient dynamics”
Claim · model-written summary
The relation between soil nutrient levels and greengram yield is multifaceted.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- soil nutrient levelse4
- Outcome
- greengram yielde4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e4“The relation between soil nutrient levels and greengram yield underscores the multifaceted relationship”
Claim · model-written summary
Genetic factors together with optimal nutrient management affect growth and yield of greengram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- optimal nutrient managemente5
- Outcome
- growth and yielde5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e5“genetic factors, coupled with optimal nutrient management, synergistically affect the growth and yield of greengram”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 175 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.