Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Biofertilizer and Fertility Levels on Growth Characters of Mungbean under Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Ananya Sood; Ranjeet Singh Bochalya; Kartikeya Choudhary; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Biofertilizers are tiny living organisms that can enrich the quality of the soil. These organisms positively imapact, making them healthier and more productive. One of the great things about biofertilizers is that they are environmentally friendly. Unlike some chemical fertilizers, they do not harm the environment. This makes them a good choice for sustainable farming practices. Another advantage of using biofertilizers is that they are cost-effective. One of their most important roles is maintaining the soil’s long-term fertility. Over time, chemical fertilizers can deplete the soil of its natural nutrients. Biofertilizers, on the other hand, work in harmony with the soil, helping to keep it healthy and productive for years to come. So, if you want to increase your soil's productivity and do so in an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way, using biofertilizers is smart and intelligent. The present investigation, titled Effect of Biofertilizer and Fertility Levels on Growth Characters of Mungbean under Mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh was conducted during the kharif season of 2022 at the Chamelti Agriculture Farm, MS Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh. The soil of the experimental site was sandy loam in texture, slightly alkaline in reaction with EC in a safe range, medium in organic carbon, available nitrogen, and potassium and high in available phosphorus. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design comprising ten treatments viz. (T₁) control, (T2) 100% RDF, (T3) 75% RDF + seed treatment with liquid biofertilizer, (T4) 100% RDF + seed treatment with liquid biofertilizer, (T5) 75% RDF + seed treatment with solid biofertilizer, (T6) 100% RDF + seed treatment with solid biofertilizer, (T7) 75% RDF + soil application with liquid biofertilizer, (T8) 100% RDF + soil application with liquid biofertilizer, (T9) 75% RDF + soil application with solid biofertilizer and (T10) 100% RDF + soil application with solid biofertilizer with three replications. The recommended dose of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (20:40:20 kg ha-1) through urea, SSP and MOP at the sowing. Biofertilizers applied for seed are 10 ml kg-1 of seed, and for the soil application, take 10 g of solid biofertilizer for 1 kg-1 of ha-1of seed and mix with 100 kg of FYM. Pusa Baisakhi variety of mungbean was used for sowing. Other crop management practices were followed as per the recommendation of the area. Significantly higher growth characteristics (plant height, no. of branches, no. of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation) were observed with (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer. They were on par with (T10) 100% RDF + soil application of solid biofertilizer over the rest of the treatments. The treatments (T6) 100% RDF + seed treatment with solid biofertilizer were statistically similar to (T4) 100% RDF + seed treatment with liquid biofertilizer, followed by treatments T7, T3 and T2. Thus, the study suggests that mungbean can be successfully grown under the Mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh on (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T8 fertilizer plus liquid biofertilizer soil treatment produced significantly higher mungbean growth characteristics than most other treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
(T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizere0
Outcome
plant height, no. of branches, no. of trifoliate leavese0
Direction
Significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher growth characteristics (plant height, no. of branches, no. of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation) were observed with (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T8 fertilizer plus liquid biofertilizer soil treatment increased mungbean dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
(T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizere0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
Significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher growth characteristics (plant height, no. of branches, no. of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation) were observed with (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 and T10 produced statistically similar mungbean growth characteristics.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
(T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizere1
Outcome
growth characteristicse1
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
(T10) 100% RDF + soil application of solid biofertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They were on par with (T10) 100% RDF + soil application of solid biofertilizer over the rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2684–2795 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher growth characteristics (plant height, no. of branches, no. of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation) were observed with (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 seed treatment with solid biofertilizer and T4 seed treatment with liquid biofertilizer produced statistically similar mungbean growth.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
(T6) 100% RDF + seed treatment with solid biofertilizere0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
(T4) 100% RDF + seed treatment with liquid biofertilizere0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments (T6) 100% RDF + seed treatment with solid biofertilizer were statistically similar to (T4) 100% RDF + seed treatment with liquid biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2796–2953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T8 for growing mungbean in the mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
(T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizere0
Outcome
successfully growne0
Setting
Mid-hills of Himachal Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean can be successfully grown under the Mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh on (T8) 100% RDF + soil application of liquid biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3023–3157 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.