Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in two seasons to compare the efficiency of various types of tillage treatments combined with different weed control methods. There was no significant difference in yield among conventional tillage (two ploughing with country plough), minimal tillage (one cultivation either with country plough or mould board plough or power tiller) and no tillage. One ploughing with mould board plough (minimal tillage) combined with atrazine band application and intercultivation recorded the maximum yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield did not significantly differ among conventional, minimal, and no tillage.
- Treatment
- minimal tillagee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference in yield among conventional tillage (two ploughing with country plough), minimal tillage (one cultivation either with country plough or mould board plough or power tiller) and no tillage”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
One mould board ploughing with atrazine band application and intercultivation produced maximum yield.
- Treatment
- One ploughing with mould board plough (minimal tillage) combined with atrazine band application and intercultivatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“One ploughing with mould board plough (minimal tillage) combined with atrazine band application and intercultivation recorded the maximum yield”
t0“Maize”
The same questions in other papers
atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.