Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Cultivar and Nutrient Management on Productivity, and Profitability of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek

Akshay Pareek; Satyajeet; Amit Kumar; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out at Research Farm of Regional Research Station, Bawal, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana during summer, 2020. In this study, main plot consisted of three different varieties, namely MH-421 (V1), MH-318 (V2) and SML-668 (V3) and subplot included four nutrient treatments, namely Control (F1), 100% RDF (F2), 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB (F3) and 50% RDF + 50% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB (F4). The result revealed that, greengram variety and nutrient treatment significantly influenced the growth, yield and economics of summer greengram. Among the greengram variety, MH-318 variety yielded significantly higher seed yield, net return and B:C ratio compared to MH-421 and SML-668. Further, application of 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB resulted in significantly higher yield, and monitory benefits. Therefore, the study suggests that fertilizing MH-318 variety with 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB to obtain higher yield and economic returns of summer greengram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-318 had significantly higher seed yield than MH-421 and SML-668.

Material
MH-318e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MH-421 and SML-668e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MH-318 variety yielded significantly higher seed yield, net return and B:C ratio compared to MH-421 and SML-668”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-318 had significantly higher net return and B:C ratio than MH-421 and SML-668.

Material
MH-318e0
Outcome
net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MH-421 and SML-668e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MH-318 variety yielded significantly higher seed yield, net return and B:C ratio compared to MH-421 and SML-668”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF plus FYM and Rhizobium/PSB treatment gave significantly higher yield.

Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB resulted in significantly higher yield, and monitory benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF plus FYM and Rhizobium/PSB treatment gave higher monetary benefits.

Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
monitory benefitse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB resulted in significantly higher yield, and monitory benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend MH-318 with the 75% RDF plus FYM and Rhizobium/PSB regime for higher yield and returns.

Material
MH-318e0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSBe0
Outcome
higher yield and economic returnse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing MH-318 variety with 75% RDF + 25% N/ha (FYM) + ST with Rhizobium + PSB to obtain higher yield and economic returns of summer greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1053 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.