Paper · 2023 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

ROLE OF NANO AND METALLIC BORON FOLIAR NUTRITION ON WATER STRESS REDUCING IN SWEET CORN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS

M. T. Riwad; M. K. Alag

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the experimental field of the Crop Sciences Department at the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences - University of Baghdad during fall seasons of 2021 and 2022. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of nano and metallic boron foliar nutrition on yield, components, water use efficiency, and water consumption under water stress for sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Randomized Complete Block Design was used within split -plot arrangement with three replicates, where the main plots included three levels of water stress (irrigation at 40, 60, and 80% of available water) coded as W1, W2, and W3, respectively. The nano and metallic boron spray concentrations represented 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg L-1 coded as N1, N2, M1, and M2, respectively. Results showed that nano and metallic boron concentrations significantly affected all the studied traits. The concentration of 5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1 significantly exceeded other concentrations under study in increasing ear length, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, and weight of 500 grains, which positively reflected on improving grain yield of 5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1. The interaction between water stress treatments and nano and metallic boron concentrations was significant for all the studied traits except for ear length.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano and metallic boron concentrations significantly affected all the studied traits of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
nano and metallic boron concentrationse2
Outcome
all the studied traitse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–412 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that nano and metallic boron concentrations significantly affected all the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano boron at 5 mg L-1 significantly increased ear length, number of rows per ear and number of grains per row relative to the other concentrations.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1e1
Outcome
ear length, number of rows per ear, number of grains per rowe1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
other concentrations under studye1

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of 5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1 significantly exceeded other concentrations under study in increasing ear length, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, and weight of 500 grains, which positively reflected on improving grain yield of 5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano boron at 5 mg L-1 significantly increased the weight of 500 grains relative to the other concentrations.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1e1
Outcome
weight of 500 grainse1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
other concentrations under studye1

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of 5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1 significantly exceeded other concentrations under study in increasing ear length, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, and weight of 500 grains, which positively reflected on improving grain yield of 5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano boron at 5 mg L-1 improved grain yield of sweet corn to 5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
improvinge1
Value
5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1e1
Comparator
other concentrations under studye1

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of 5 mg L-1 of nano boron N1 significantly exceeded other concentrations under study in increasing ear length, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, and weight of 500 grains, which positively reflected on improving grain yield of 5.93 and 5.96 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1174 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between water stress and nano and metallic boron concentrations was significant for all studied traits of sweet corn except ear length.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
water stress treatments and nano and metallic boron concentrationse3
Outcome
all the studied traits except for ear lengthe3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–412 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction between water stress treatments and nano and metallic boron concentrations was significant for all the studied traits except for ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1331 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.