Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural Research Station during 1997 and 1998 seasons, using the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 87 (G. barbadense L.) to study the effect of some cultural treatments in order to check excessive vegetative growth i.e. topping at 120 days age, spraying 8 kg/fed. super phosphate (15% P2 05) on mid-July and 15 days later, spraying Pix (mepivat chloride) 500 ml/fed. (50 gm a.i/L) twice in the beginning of squaring and 15 days later and single spray of Pix at the beginning of squaring +topping at 120 days age, besides untreated control. The results indicated that the different treatments significantly affected all the studied characters compared to the control except number of fruiting sites whereas they reduced final plant height, main stem internodal length. monopodia. sympodia, aborted sites and unopen bolls/plant. In general the studied treatments increased boll retention, earliness percentage, number of open bolts, boll weight, lint percentage, seed index and seed cotton yield (Kintar/fed.). The main prominent effect was detected with single spray of Pix + toping followed by two sprayings of Pix specially for seed cotton yield and its components.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not significantly affect fruiting-site number relative to control.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“different treatments significantly affected all the studied characters compared to the control except number of fruiting sites”
t0“COTTON”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments reduced final plant height, main stem internodal length, and monopodia.
- Taxon
- COTTON
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- different treatmentse1
- Outcome
- final plant height, main stem internodal length. monopodiae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they reduced final plant height, main stem internodal length. monopodia.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“different treatments significantly affected all the studied characters compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments reduced sympodia, aborted sites, and unopened bolls per plant.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse1
- Outcome
- sympodia, aborted sites and unopen bolls/plante0
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sympodia, aborted sites and unopen bolls/plant.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“different treatments significantly affected all the studied characters compared to the control”
e2“they reduced final plant height, main stem internodal length. monopodia. sympodia, aborted sites and unopen bolls/plant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments increased boll retention, earliness percentage, and open boll number.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- studied treatmentse0
- Outcome
- boll retention, earliness percentage, number of open boltse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studied treatments increased boll retention, earliness percentage, number of open bolts”
t0“COTTON”
e1“compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments increased boll weight, lint percentage, and seed index.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- studied treatmentse0
- Outcome
- boll weight, lint percentage, seed indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studied treatments increased boll retention, earliness percentage, number of open bolts, boll weight, lint percentage, seed index and seed cotton yield”
t0“COTTON”
e1“compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments increased seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- studied treatmentse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studied treatments increased boll retention, earliness percentage, number of open bolts, boll weight, lint percentage, seed index and seed cotton yield (Kintar/fed.).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Single Pix spray plus topping had the most prominent effect on seed cotton yield and components, followed by two Pix sprays.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- single spray of Pix + topinge0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- main prominente0
- Comparator
- two sprayings of Pixe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“main prominent effect was detected with single spray of Pix + toping followed by two sprayings of Pix specially for seed cotton yield and its components.”
t0“COTTON”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.