Paper · 2023 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

Influence of plant growth regulators on the main morphological parameters of Paeonia

Antonina Anatolievna Reut

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The article reflects the results of studying the effectiveness of the action of the specialized preparations «Lignohumate» and «Trener» on the growth, development and decorative qualities of some representatives of the Paeonia L. genus complex in the conditions of the forest-steppe zone of the Bashkir Cis-Ural. For the first time in the conditions of the Southern Ural, the influence of new growth stimulants on the decorativeness of some varieties of Paeonia lactiflora from the collection of the SUBGI UFRC RAS was studied. It is shown that under the influence of the studied preparations there was an increase in the number of shoots and flowers on one peduncle, as well as a change in the diameter and height of the flower. It was noted that the use of growth regulators significantly affected the following decorative features: the size of the flower, the abundance of flowering and the number of buds on the peduncle. Among the economic and biological parameters, a large difference between the control and the experiment was noted for the traits: productivity and duration of flowering, reproductive ability and resistance to diseases and pests. Thus, the studied plant growth regulators can be recommended for use in floriculture, as they increase the decorative effect of cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparations increased shoots and flowers per peduncle.

Treatment
studied preparationse0
Outcome
number of shoots and flowers on one pedunclee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“under the influence of the studied preparations there was an increase in the number of shoots and flowers on one peduncle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparations changed flower diameter and height.

Outcome
diameter and height of the flowere0
Direction
changee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“as well as a change in the diameter and height of the flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators significantly affected flower size, flowering abundance and buds per peduncle.

Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
the size of the flower, the abundance of flowering and the number of buds on the pedunclee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the use of growth regulators significantly affected the following decorative features: the size of the flower, the abundance of flowering and the number of buds on the peduncle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control and treated plants differed substantially in productivity, flowering duration and reproductive ability.

Treatment
experimente0
Outcome
productivity and duration of flowering, reproductive abilitye0
Direction
differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a large difference between the control and the experiment was noted for the traits: productivity and duration of flowering, reproductive ability and resistance to diseases and pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control and treated plants differed substantially in resistance to diseases and pests.

Treatment
experimente0
Outcome
resistance to diseases and pestse0
Direction
differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a large difference between the control and the experiment was noted for the traits: productivity and duration of flowering, reproductive ability and resistance to diseases and pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1153 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the growth regulators for floriculture to improve cultivar ornamentation.

Treatment
studied plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
use in floriculturee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the studied plant growth regulators can be recommended for use in floriculture, as they increase the decorative effect of cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1292 · show in text ↑