Abstract
Field experiments on effect of sowing dates and screening of genotypes in reference to linseed bud fly infestation were conducted during rabi 2016-17 under natural field conditions. The tested genotypes/varieties have shown high infestation of linseed bud fly and low yield in progressive manner with delay in sowing. The lowest mean bud fly infestation (13.39%) and highest mean yield (1385.30 kg ha-1) was obtained with the crop sown on 08.11.2016 whereas the highest mean bud fly infestation (37.46%) and lowest mean yield (177.75 kg ha-1) was obtained with crop sown on 08.01.2017. In case of varieties, the lowest mean bud fly infestation (19.83%) was observed in BRLS-102 followed by Shekhar (22.23%) whereas Shubhra resulted in highest mean bud fly infestation (32.82%). Out of tested genotypes, a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Later sowing progressively increased bud fly infestation.
- Taxon
- linseede0
- Treatment
- delay in sowinge0
- Interactor
- linseed bud flye0pest
- Outcome
- infestation of linseed bud flye0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The tested genotypes/varieties have shown high infestation of linseed bud fly and low yield in progressive manner with delay in sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Later sowing progressively reduced yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The tested genotypes/varieties have shown high infestation of linseed bud fly and low yield in progressive manner with delay in sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 08.11.2016 gave the lowest mean bud fly infestation, 13.39%.
- Treatment
- sown on 08.11.2016e0
- Interactor
- bud flye0pest
- Outcome
- bud fly infestatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 13.39%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The lowest mean bud fly infestation (13.39%) and highest mean yield (1385.30 kg ha-1) was obtained with the crop sown on 08.11.2016”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 08.11.2016 gave the highest mean yield, 1385.30 kg ha-1.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The lowest mean bud fly infestation (13.39%) and highest mean yield (1385.30 kg ha-1) was obtained with the crop sown on 08.11.2016”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 08.01.2017 gave the highest mean bud fly infestation, 37.46%.
- Treatment
- sown on 08.01.2017e0
- Interactor
- bud flye0pest
- Outcome
- bud fly infestatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 37.46%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“the highest mean bud fly infestation (37.46%) and lowest mean yield (177.75 kg ha-1) was obtained with crop sown on 08.01.2017.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 08.01.2017 gave the lowest mean yield, 177.75 kg ha-1.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“the highest mean bud fly infestation (37.46%) and lowest mean yield (177.75 kg ha-1) was obtained with crop sown on 08.01.2017.”
Claim · model-written summary
BRLS-102 had the lowest mean bud fly infestation, 19.83%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the lowest mean bud fly infestation (19.83%) was observed in BRLS-102 followed by Shekhar (22.23%) whereas Shubhra resulted in highest mean bud fly infestation (32.82%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Shekhar had 22.23% mean bud fly infestation.
Not reportedTaxonDirection
Verbatim
e0“the lowest mean bud fly infestation (19.83%) was observed in BRLS-102 followed by Shekhar (22.23%) whereas Shubhra resulted in highest mean bud fly infestation (32.82%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Shubhra had the highest mean bud fly infestation, 32.82%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the lowest mean bud fly infestation (19.83%) was observed in BRLS-102 followed by Shekhar (22.23%) whereas Shubhra resulted in highest mean bud fly infestation (32.82%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Twelve genotypes were resistant by bud fly damage index.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sixty-five genotypes were moderately resistant by bud fly damage index.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seventeen genotypes were moderately susceptible by bud fly damage index.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Five genotypes were susceptible by bud fly damage index.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Two genotypes were highly susceptible by bud fly damage index.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“a total of 12, 65, 17, 5, 2 genotypes were categorized as resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively based on bud fly damage index under natural field conditions.”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.