Abstract
Abstract The paper proves that crop rotation and cotton monoculture turned out to be the best agro technical measures in reducing the number of weeds against the control variant which was found by the authors as a result of long-term studies of cotton crop rotations. The results of the studies showed that permanent cotton crop without and with mineral fertilizers in the absence of crop rotation contribute to a significant increase in the number of annual and perennial weeds. Development of crop rotations with strict alternation of cotton with the main predecessors in the cotton complex, as well as appropriate agro-technical measures significantly reduce the weed infestation of cotton field during the entire cotton growing season.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton rotation reduced weed number versus the control.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- crop rotatione0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number of weedse0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“crop rotation and cotton monoculture turned out to be the best agro technical measures in reducing the number of weeds against the control variant”
Claim · model-written summary
Permanent cotton without mineral fertilizers and without rotation significantly increased annual and perennial weed numbers.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- permanent cotton crop withoute0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number of annual and perennial weedse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- in the absence of crop rotatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“permanent cotton crop without and with mineral fertilizers in the absence of crop rotation contribute to a significant increase in the number of annual and perennial weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Permanent cotton with mineral fertilizers and without rotation significantly increased annual and perennial weed numbers.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- with mineral fertilizers in the absence of crop rotatione0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number of annual and perennial weedse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“permanent cotton crop without and with mineral fertilizers in the absence of crop rotation contribute to a significant increase in the number of annual and perennial weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Rotations strictly alternating cotton with its main predecessors significantly reduced cotton-field weed infestation throughout the growing season.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- crop rotations with strict alternation of cotton with the main predecessorse0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed infestation of cotton fielde0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- during the entire cotton growing seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“crop rotations with strict alternation of cotton with the main predecessors in the cotton complex, as well as appropriate agro-technical measures significantly reduce the weed infestation of cotton field during the entire cotton growing season”
The same questions in other papers
rotation · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
fertilization · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.