Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Bio-efficacy of metribuzin based herbicide mixtures on weeds and productivity of wheat

SARITA RANI; SURESH KUMAR; V.S. HOODA; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 201415 and 201516 at Hisar, Haryana, to study bioefficacy of metribuzin-based herbicide mixture on weeds and producitivty of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design comprising 5 wheat varieties WH 1105, HD 2967, DPW 621-50, WH 1124 and DBW 17 in main plots and 6 weed-management practices, viz. metribuzin (210 g/ha), metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha), metribuzin + pinoxaden (150 + 40 g/ha) metribuzin + clodinafop (150 + 45 g/ha), weed-free and weedy check, in subplots, each replicated thrice. The wheat varieties did not affect the weed den- sity and weed dry-matter accumulation. Wheat variety WH 1105 resulted in the maximum grain, straw and biologi- cal yields, being statistically at par with HD 2967 and DPW 621-50, but significantly better over DBW 17 and WH 1124. Among the herbicides, the density of grassy and total weeds and their dry-matter accumulation at all stages were observed minimum with metribuzin + fenoxaprop which remained at par with other 2 combinations of metribuzin, whereas density and dry matter of broad-leaf weeds were found minimum with metribuzin alone (210 g/ha). Alone application of metribuzin resulted in the lowest grain yield of wheat as compared to all the other herbi- cidal treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat varieties did not affect weed density or dry matter.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed den- sity and weed dry-matter accumulatione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat varieties did not affect the weed den- sity and weed dry-matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WH 1105 had maximum grain, straw and biological yields, statistically similar to HD 2967 and DPW 621-50 but above DBW 17 and WH 1124.

Material
WH 1105e0
Outcome
grain, straw and biologi- cal yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
HD 2967 and DPW 621-50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety WH 1105 resulted in the maximum grain, straw and biologi- cal yields, being statistically at par with HD 2967 and DPW 621-50, but significantly better over DBW 17 and WH 1124.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin plus fenoxaprop minimized grassy and total weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
metribuzin + fenoxaprope0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density of grassy and total weeds and their dry-matter accumulatione0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other 2 combinations of metribuzine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of grassy and total weeds and their dry-matter accumulation at all stages were observed minimum with metribuzin + fenoxaprop which remained at par with other 2 combinations of metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin alone minimized broadleaf weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
metribuzin alone (210 g/ha)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density and dry matter of broad-leaf weedse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“density and dry matter of broad-leaf weeds were found minimum with metribuzin alone (210 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin alone produced the lowest wheat grain yield among herbicides.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all the other herbi- cidal treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alone application of metribuzin resulted in the lowest grain yield of wheat as compared to all the other herbi- cidal treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1319 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.