Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences

Impact of delaying harvesting dates for sugar beet varieties under recent environmental changes

Dalia Ibrahim El-Geddawy; Karam Abd El-Sadek Abd Elsalam; Ibrahim Abd ElBaki Abd Elateef

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted at Experimental Sennuris District in Fayoum Governorate, Egypt (latitude of 29024/26//N and longitude of 30052/00//E) to investigate the effect of harvest dates on some sugar beet varieties concerning their yield and quality. Two successive field experiments were carried out in the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022. A randomized complete block split plots were assigned for the four harvesting dates (mid-February, 1st week of March, mid-March and 1st week of April), i.e. at the age of 180, 195, 210 and 225 days after sowing. The sub-plots were occupied by the four sugar beet varieties i.e. (Faraida, Jampol, Fantazja and Melodia). The obtained results revealed that there were significant differences among the four studied harvesting dates concerning root length, diameter and weight as well as root yield in both seasons. The highest values were obtained by delaying the harvesting up to 225 days from sowing. Concerning the quality traits, neither the harvesting date nor the varieties affected sucrose, purity (QZ), sodium, potassium, α-amino N and sugar recovery percentages in both seasons. However, the upper mid-harvesting date i.e. age of 195 days from sowing recorded the lower significant impurities and SLM percentages in the 1st season only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 225 days gave the highest root dimensions, weight, and yield in both seasons.

Treatment
delaying the harvesting up to 225 days from sowinge0
Outcome
root length, diameter and weight as well as root yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The obtained results revealed that there were significant differences among the four studied harvesting dates concerning root length, diameter and weight as well as root yield in both seasons. The highest values were obtained by delaying the harvesting up to 225 days from sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest date and variety did not affect six reported quality traits in either season.

Treatment
harvesting datee0
Outcome
sucrose, purity (QZ), sodium, potassium, α-amino N and sugar recovery percentagese0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither the harvesting date nor the varieties affected sucrose, purity (QZ), sodium, potassium, α-amino N and sugar recovery percentages in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 195 days lowered impurities and SLM percentages in the first season only.

Treatment
age of 195 days from sowinge0
Outcome
impurities and SLM percentagese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in the 1st season onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the upper mid-harvesting date i.e. age of 195 days from sowing recorded the lower significant impurities and SLM percentages in the 1st season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑

harvest time · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.