Paper · 2023 · Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology

An Utilizing Marginal Red Yellow Podzolic Soil as a Growing Medium for Auxin-Soaked Cutting Propagation of Red Master Grapes (Vitis vinifera L)

Saktiyono Sigit Tri Pamungkas; Yudhi Pramudya; Fitria Nugraheni Sukmawati; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivation is hampered by a lack of suitable land and challenging nurseries. Use of crimson yellow podzolic soil for vine cuttings can be suboptimal. Although podzolic soil has a low capacity to absorb macro- and micronutrients and an acidic pH, it can nevertheless be used as a growing medium. A synthetic growth regulator (ZPT) bath of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) needs to be added to the local red master grape variety, which has started to develop as a scion in nurseries. In order to assess the impacts of NAA-soaked concentrations on podzolic soil media and identify the morphological traits of local Red Master grape cuttings, this study set out to identify these traits. Its goal was to find out how auxin affected the development and yield of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) grown in red yellow podzolic soil. A non-factorial totally randomized design with one factor (NAA concentration) was used in the study, with a block of 4 treatments and 3 repetitions. The varied NAA concentrations used in the treatment procedure included F0 (0 g L-1), F1 (2 g L-1), F2 (4 g L-1), and F3 (6 g L-1). The variables that were observed included the number of shoot bursts, the timing of leaf emergence, the number of sheet leaves, the length of the tendrils, and the proportion of live cuttings. ANOVA was used to tabulate and analyze observational data at a 5% level, and DMRT analysis was used to continue the analysis at the same level. According to the results, soaked NAA at a concentration of 0 g L-1 (S0) as the control treatment had the best results for the variable number of shoots and leaves, while a concentration of 2 g L-1 (S1) had the best results for the variable length of tendrils. However, soaked NAA had no significant impact on the variable when leaves emerged. Soaking auxin at the bottom of cuttings had no effect on shoot formation. Reduction of auxin due to defoliation can result in the expression of the isopentenyl-transferase (IPT) gene. Auxins, such as Indole-3-acetic acid (NAA), are usually involved in the regulation of root and leaf growth. If a plant has many leaves and few roots without the use of additional NAA or auxin, several factors may play a role, such as plant genetics, environmental conditions, and environmental stress. The use of additional NAA or auxin can explicitly affect the growth of roots and leaves. The survival percentage of cuttings is still low because it is influenced by the quality (material) of the cuttings, the age of the parent tree, growing media and water availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control gave the best shoot and leaf numbers.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
0 g L-1 (S0)e0
Outcome
number of shoots and leavese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soaked NAA at a concentration of 0 g L-1 (S0) as the control treatment had the best results for the variable number of shoots and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 g L-1 NAA gave the best tendril length.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
2 g L-1 (S1)e0
Outcome
length of tendrilse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a concentration of 2 g L-1 (S1) had the best results for the variable length of tendrils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA soaking did not significantly affect leaf emergence timing.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
soaked NAAe0
Outcome
when leaves emergede0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soaked NAA had no significant impact on the variable when leaves emerged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin soaking at the bottom of cuttings had no effect on shoot formation.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Soaking auxin at the bottom of cuttingse0
Outcome
shoot formatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking auxin at the bottom of cuttings had no effect on shoot formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting survival remained low and was attributed to cutting quality, parent age, medium and water.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
survival percentage of cuttingse0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
quality (material) of the cuttings, the age of the parent tree, growing media and water availabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“The survival percentage of cuttings is still low because it is influenced by the quality (material) of the cuttings, the age of the parent tree, growing media and water availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2375–2556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑

class · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.