Abstract
The effect of different fertilizers (digestate, Ureastabil) and their combinations with strip-till/no-till technology on yield and selected quality parameters of the maize hybrid KWS Kampinos (FAO 200) in a dual cropping system (winter rye - maize) was assessed in two-year field trials (harvest 2021-2022). A significant influence of year was found in most monitored parameters. A total of 6 variants were compared, 2 variants with no-till and 4 variants with strip-till. After using the strip-till method, the silage maize yield increased significantly (11.8 – 15.4 t DM/ha) compared to the no-till method, either on the unfertilized variant (8.3 t DM/ha) or after applying fertilizer Ureastabil (11.44 t DM/ha). When using the strip-till method, no significant differences in the yield of silage maize (average over 2 years) were demonstrated between these three fertilized variants: Ureastabil (14.03 t DM/ha); digestate + Ureastabil (15.4 t DM/ha), digestate (14.2 t DM/ha) at total dose of 120 kg N/ha for each variant. The dry matter content of the silage biomass was insignificant between all the variants (32.0 – 34.1%). Differences in quality parameters of silage under the influence of fertilization variants were minimal (crude protein, starch, ash, ADF) or none (NDF). From the results obtained, it can be concluded that maize can be successfully grown and fertilized with strip-till soil conservation technology.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Year significantly influenced most monitored maize parameters.
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“A significant influence of year was found in most monitored parameters.”
t0“silage maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip-till increased silage maize yield significantly over no-till, with strip-till yields of 11.8 – 15.4 t DM/ha.
- Treatment
- strip-till methode0
- Outcome
- silage maize yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11.8 – 15.4 t DM/hae0
- Qualifier
- unfertilized variant (8.3 t DM/ha)e0
- Comparator
- no-till methode0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After using the strip-till method, the silage maize yield increased significantly (11.8 – 15.4 t DM/ha) compared to the no-till method, either on the unfertilized variant (8.3 t DM/ha) or after applying fertilizer Ureastabil (11.44 t DM/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
The three fertilized strip-till variants had no significant differences in silage maize yield.
- Treatment
- Ureastabile0
- Outcome
- yield of silage maizee0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Qualifier
- digestate (14.2 t DM/ha) at total dose of 120 kg N/hae0
- Comparator
- digestate + Ureastabile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant differences in the yield of silage maize (average over 2 years) were demonstrated between these three fertilized variants: Ureastabil (14.03 t DM/ha); digestate + Ureastabil (15.4 t DM/ha), digestate (14.2 t DM/ha) at total dose of 120 kg N/ha for each variant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Silage biomass dry matter content did not differ significantly among variants.
Verbatim
e0“The dry matter content of the silage biomass was insignificant between all the variants (32.0 – 34.1%).”
t0“silage maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization variants produced minimal differences in silage crude protein, starch and ash.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in quality parameters of silage under the influence of fertilization variants were minimal (crude protein, starch, ash, ADF) or none (NDF).”
t0“silage maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization variants produced minimal differences in silage ADF.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in quality parameters of silage under the influence of fertilization variants were minimal (crude protein, starch, ash, ADF) or none (NDF).”
t0“silage maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization variants produced no difference in silage NDF.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in quality parameters of silage under the influence of fertilization variants were minimal (crude protein, starch, ash, ADF) or none (NDF).”
t0“silage maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude maize can be grown and fertilized using strip-till conservation technology.
- Outcome
- grown and fertilized with strip-till soil conservation technologye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maize can be successfully grown and fertilized with strip-till soil conservation technology.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.