Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

The Reactions of Common Chemical Fertilizers in An Ultisol and Their Effects on Cowpea Performance

Oyeyiola Yetunde Bunmi; Omueti John Ajayi

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Chemical fertilizers (CF) are the major input on arable farms in Nigeria. Current increasing rate of nutrient depletion in CF treated soils calls for the need to study their reactions in soils. To achieve this, three CF based treatments, namely NPK 15:15:15 applied at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, Urea applied at 20 kg N ha-1 mixed with Single superphosphate at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, and single superphosphate at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 mixed with Gliricidia sepium leaves at 20 kg N ha-1 were studied. Sole lime (CaCO3) at 1 Mg ha-1 and a plot that received no amendment were compared. Cowpea was grown for two consecutive cropping seasons in 2012 and 2013 on the treated fields. The results indicated that CF reduced soil pH from initial 4.8 to 4.0. The NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer was the most severe of the CF tested, removing up to 133% alkalinity from the soil relative to lime. The NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation (from 25% to 21%) and magnesium saturation (from 12% to 8.3%) and increased acidity saturation (from 53% to 66%) with significant reductions in organic carbon content (from 13.2 g kg-1 to 11.0 g kg-1). Precaution including co-application of CF with organic materials such as Gliricidia sepium leaves can benefit for the soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizers reduced soil pH from 4.8 to 4.0.

Treatment
CFe0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.0e0
Comparator
initial 4.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CF reduced soil pH from initial 4.8 to 4.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 15:15:15 removed up to 133% soil alkalinity relative to lime.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15 fertilizere0
Outcome
alkalinity from the soile0
Direction
removinge0
Value
133%e0
Comparator
limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer was the most severe of the CF tested, removing up to 133% alkalinity from the soil relative to lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation from 25% to 21%.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15e0
Outcome
calcium saturatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation (from 25% to 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 15:15:15 reduced magnesium saturation from 12% to 8.3%.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15e1
Outcome
magnesium saturatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
8.3%e0
Comparator
12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium saturation (from 12% to 8.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“The NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 15:15:15 increased acidity saturation from 53% to 66%.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15e0
Outcome
acidity saturatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
66%e0
Comparator
53%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation (from 25% to 21%) and magnesium saturation (from 12% to 8.3%) and increased acidity saturation (from 53% to 66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 15:15:15 significantly reduced soil organic carbon from 13.2 to 11.0 g kg-1.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15e0
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
11.0 g kg-1e0
Comparator
13.2 g kg-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK 15:15:15 reduced calcium saturation (from 25% to 21%) and magnesium saturation (from 12% to 8.3%) and increased acidity saturation (from 53% to 66%) with significant reductions in organic carbon content (from 13.2 g kg-1 to 11.0 g kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend coapplying chemical fertilizers with organic materials such as Gliricidia leaves for soil benefit.

Outcome
co-application of CF with organic materials such as Gliricidia sepium leaves can benefit for the soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-application of CF with organic materials such as Gliricidia sepium leaves can benefit for the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.