Paper · 2024 · Acta Botanica Croatica

Clarifying genetic and taxonomic relationships among Pistacia taxa (Anacardiaceae) in Croatia

Martina Temunović; Zrinka Šola; Viktor Jakšić; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the eastern Adriatic flora the genus Pistacia L. (Anacardiaceae) is represented with P. lentiscus L., P. terebinthus L., their hybrid P . × saportae Burnat and the cultivated P . vera L. In addition, an endemic putative taxon from Mt. Biokovo was described in 1985 as P. calcivora Radić. Our aim was to resolve relationships between the four putative indigenous taxa of this genus in Croatia ( P. lentiscus , P. terebinthus , P . × saportae and P. calcivora ) based on genetic (AFLP) and morphological data. Specifically, we aimed to determine the presence of the hybrid taxon P . × saportae and to validate the controversial taxonomic status of P. calcivora at the molecular and morphological levels. Our combined results indicate the presence of two well separated groups of populations. The first group included all individuals of P. terebinthus and the individuals initially assigned to the potential taxon P. calcivora based on leaf morphology, suggesting that there is no support for the described taxon P. calcivora and that it should be considered as a synonym for P. terebinthus . The second group corresponded to P. lentiscus and included the majority of the presumed hybrid individuals of P . × saportae . However, four hybrid individuals were confirmed at the molecular level and were placed between the two parental taxa in the phylogenetic tree, confirming the presence of P. × saportae in Croatia. Although confirmed P. × saportae individuals were genetically closer to P. lentiscus , they were morphologically more similar to P. terebinthus , hindering their correct identification in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two well separated population groups were found.

Taxon
populationse0
Outcome
two well separated groups of populationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Our combined results indicate the presence of two well separated groups of populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. calcivora individuals grouped with P. terebinthus, supporting synonymy.

Taxon
P. calcivorae0
Outcome
synonym for P. terebinthuse0

Verbatim

e0

“The first group included all individuals of P. terebinthus and the individuals initially assigned to the potential taxon P. calcivora based on leaf morphology, suggesting that there is no support for the described taxon P. calcivora and that it should be considered as a synonym for P. terebinthus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second group corresponded to P. lentiscus and included most presumed P. × saportae hybrids.

Taxon
P. lentiscusPistacia lentiscuse0
Outcome
second groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second group corresponded to P. lentiscus and included the majority of the presumed hybrid individuals of P . × saportae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1217 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four P. × saportae hybrids were molecularly confirmed and placed between parental taxa.

Taxon
P. × saportaePistacia ×saportaee0
Outcome
four hybrid individuals were confirmede0
Setting
Croatiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia x saportae
Pistacia ×saportae · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four hybrid individuals were confirmed at the molecular level and were placed between the two parental taxa in the phylogenetic tree, confirming the presence of P. × saportae in Croatia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1414 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Confirmed P. × saportae individuals were genetically closer to P. lentiscus.

Taxon
P. × saportaePistacia ×saportaee0
Outcome
genetically closer to P. lentiscuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia x saportae
Pistacia ×saportae · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“confirmed P. × saportae individuals were genetically closer to P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Confirmed P. × saportae individuals were morphologically more similar to P. terebinthus.

Taxon
P. × saportaePistacia ×saportaee0
Outcome
morphologically more similar to P. terebinthuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia x saportae
Pistacia ×saportae · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“confirmed P. × saportae individuals were genetically closer to P. lentiscus , they were morphologically more similar to P. terebinthus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1559 · show in text ↑