Paper · 2023 · Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences

Prevalence Of Nematode Population In Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems And Its Impact On Crop Growth

Arun Rathod; Shimpy Sarkar; Jayita Hore; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study the prevalence of nematode population in two different cultivation systems (SRI and conventional) on rice cv. IET- 4094 (Khitish). Total twenty-eight plots were laid out in paired plot technique. Irrespective of rice cultivation systems, there had been a steady hike in population of Meloidogyne graminicola and Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodi with the maximum being recorded near harvest and a sudden fall during fallow period was observed. The study indicated that SRI cultivation provided comparatively more favourable ecological condition for steady buildup of M. graminicola and T. mashhoodi population than conventional system. Between two systems, SRI method encountered comparatively more population of Hoplolaimus indicus. The spiral nematode, Helicotylenchus dihystera was also found associated with the rice crop but statistical analysis did not reveal any stable result to come into conclusion about their ecological preference. The study revealed that continuous submergence of rice field as in conventional system was detrimental to growth and reproduction of R. reniformis. The rice crop grown under SRI method acquired more vigorous growth as compared to conventional system. Profuse root and shoot growth as evidenced by root length, root biomass yield and straw yield in SRI might have limit the yield reduction in spite of huge infestation of nematodes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne graminicola population rose steadily in rice regardless of cultivation system, peaked near harvest and fell during fallow.

Material
cv. IET- 4094 (Khitish)e1
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pest
Outcome
populatione2
Qualifier
maximum being recorded near harveste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“An experiment was carried out to study the prevalence of nematode population in two different cultivation systems (SRI and conventional) on rice cv. IET- 4094 (Khitish)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrespective of rice cultivation systems, there had been a steady hike in population of Meloidogyne graminicola and Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodi with the maximum being recorded near harvest and a sudden fall during fallow period was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodi population rose steadily in rice regardless of cultivation system, peaked near harvest and fell during fallow.

Material
cv. IET- 4094 (Khitish)e1
Interactor
Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodie2pest
Outcome
populatione2
Qualifier
maximum being recorded near harveste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“An experiment was carried out to study the prevalence of nematode population in two different cultivation systems (SRI and conventional) on rice cv. IET- 4094 (Khitish)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrespective of rice cultivation systems, there had been a steady hike in population of Meloidogyne graminicola and Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodi with the maximum being recorded near harvest and a sudden fall during fallow period was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI cultivation was more favourable than the conventional system for the buildup of Meloidogyne graminicola population in rice.

Treatment
SRI cultivatione3
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae3pest
Outcome
buildupe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Comparator
conventional systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study indicated that SRI cultivation provided comparatively more favourable ecological condition for steady buildup of M. graminicola and T. mashhoodi population than conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI cultivation was more favourable than the conventional system for the buildup of Tylenchorhynchus mashhoodi population in rice.

Treatment
SRI cultivatione3
Interactor
T. mashhoodie3pest
Outcome
buildupe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Comparator
conventional systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study indicated that SRI cultivation provided comparatively more favourable ecological condition for steady buildup of M. graminicola and T. mashhoodi population than conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–666 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method encountered more Hoplolaimus indicus population than the conventional system in rice.

Treatment
SRI methode4
Interactor
Hoplolaimus indicusHoplolaimus indicuse4pest
Outcome
populatione4
Direction
higherinferrede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“Between two systems, SRI method encountered comparatively more population of Hoplolaimus indicus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–764 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Helicotylenchus dihystera was found associated with rice, but no stable result on its ecological preference was obtained.

Interactor
Helicotylenchus dihysteraHelicotylenchus dihysterae5pest
Outcome
ecological preferencee5
Qualifier
statistical analysis did not reveal any stable resulte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicotylenchus dihystera
Helicotylenchus dihystera · InteractorJIRCAS Library · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The spiral nematode, Helicotylenchus dihystera was also found associated with the rice crop but statistical analysis did not reveal any stable result to come into conclusion about their ecological preference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–973 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence of the rice field, as in the conventional system, was detrimental to growth and reproduction of R. reniformis.

Treatment
continuous submergencee6
Interactor
R. reniformise6pest
Outcome
growth and reproductione6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“The study revealed that continuous submergence of rice field as in conventional system was detrimental to growth and reproduction of R. reniformis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grown under the SRI method had more vigorous growth than under the conventional system.

Treatment
SRI methode7
Outcome
growthe7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Comparator
conventional systeme7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The rice crop grown under SRI method acquired more vigorous growth as compared to conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1224 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the SRI method, rice had profuse root and shoot growth, with higher root length, root biomass yield and straw yield.

Treatment
SRIe7
Outcome
root length, root biomass yield and straw yielde7
Qualifier
Profuse root and shoot growthe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Profuse root and shoot growth as evidenced by root length, root biomass yield and straw yield in SRI might have limit the yield reduction in spite of huge infestation of nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1405 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Profuse root and shoot growth of rice may have limited yield reduction despite heavy nematode infestation.

Outcome
yield reductione7
Qualifier
Profuse root and shoot growthe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Different Rice Cultivation Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Profuse root and shoot growth as evidenced by root length, root biomass yield and straw yield in SRI might have limit the yield reduction in spite of huge infestation of nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1405 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.