Paper · 2023 · Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management

Image Segmentation of Plant Leaves in Natural Environments Based on LinkNet

Lili Zhang; Xiyin Liang

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The conventional approach to plant leaf image segmentation for subsequent measurement of leaf geometric parameters, while reasonably accurate, exhibits lower efficiency. To address this challenge, a plant leaf image segmentation algorithm based on deep learning semantic segmentation models and transfer learning is proposed to achieve rapid and precise leaf segmentation. The presented method adopts LinkNet as its foundational network structure and introduces four key enhancements: leveraging ResNet18 as the backbone encoder network to expedite model fitting through transfer learning; reducing the number of encoding and decoding blocks to decrease network complexity; refining channel reduction strategies to minimize parameters in upsampling; and implementing subpixel convolution for upsampling to lower computational load. Integrated with the focal loss function, this improved LinkNet network is applied to a standard leaf dataset. Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks. This algorithm not only swiftly segments the main body of leaves but also effectively preserves details such as leaf edge serrations. It truly enables efficient and precise segmentation of plant leaves, offering a novel approach for rapidly measuring leaf area and other geometric parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed leaf segmentation algorithm achieved 97.27% accuracy, comparable to original LinkNet.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
segmentation accuracye0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
97.27%e0
Comparator
original LinkNete0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1366 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The algorithm took 7.82 ms per inference, 39.89% less than original LinkNet.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
inference timee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7.82 mse0
Qualifier
39.89%e0
Comparator
original networke0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1366 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The algorithm substantially reduced model parameters.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
model parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
original networke0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1366 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The algorithm substantially reduced floating-point operations.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
floating-point operationse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
original networke0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1366 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved network inferred significantly faster than FCN, U-Net, and DeepLabV3+.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
inference speede0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+e0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves a segmentation accuracy of 97.27%, comparable to the original LinkNet; inference time is merely 7.82 ms, a 39.89% reduction compared to the original network; a substantial decrease in model parameters and floating-point operations; and a significantly faster inference speed of the improved network compared to FCN, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, and similar networks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1366 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The algorithm preserved leaf edge serrations during segmentation.

Taxon
Plant Leavest0
Outcome
preserves details such as leaf edge serrationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirectionValue

Verbatim

t0

“Plant Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“This algorithm not only swiftly segments the main body of leaves but also effectively preserves details such as leaf edge serrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1500 · show in text ↑