Abstract
To study the growth, yield and economics of fodder grasses at Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh, experiment was established in July 2022 with three treatments and five replications. In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo). Results indicated that the maximum height was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 186.60 cm followed by T2: Para grass 132 cm and minimum in T3: Stylo 57 cm. The plant population was maximum found in T3: Stylo 16 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier and T2: Para grass 4 whereas number of tillers or branches per meter square found maximum in T3: Stylo 159.80 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier 158.60 and minimum in T2: Para grass 120. The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively. The maximum net return was found in T1: Hybrid Napier Rs. 75,660 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 62.505 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 61,605. The maximum B:C ratio was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 2.86 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 2.61 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 2.29.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had the maximum height, 186.60 cm.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e1“the maximum height was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 186.60 cm followed by T2: Para grass 132 cm and minimum in T3: Stylo 57 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had a height of 132 cm, lower than Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria mutica
Urochloa muticae0 - Material
- Para grasse1
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 132 cme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e1“the maximum height was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 186.60 cm followed by T2: Para grass 132 cm and minimum in T3: Stylo 57 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had the minimum height, 57 cm.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamata
_Taub._(6254148545).jpg?width=60)
Stylosanthes hamatae0 - Material
- Styloe1
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 57 cme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Taub._(6254148545).jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e1“the maximum height was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 186.60 cm followed by T2: Para grass 132 cm and minimum in T3: Stylo 57 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had the maximum plant population, 16.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe2
- Outcome
- plant populatione2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 16e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e2“The plant population was maximum found in T3: Stylo 16 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier and T2: Para grass 4”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had a plant population of 4, lower than Stylo and Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse2
- Outcome
- plant populatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 4e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e2“The plant population was maximum found in T3: Stylo 16 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier and T2: Para grass 4”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had the maximum number of tillers or branches per meter square, 159.80.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe3
- Outcome
- number of tillers or branches per meter squaree3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 159.80e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e3“number of tillers or branches per meter square found maximum in T3: Stylo 159.80 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier 158.60 and minimum in T2: Para grass 120”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had 158.60 tillers or branches per meter square, lower than Stylo.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e3“number of tillers or branches per meter square found maximum in T3: Stylo 159.80 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier 158.60 and minimum in T2: Para grass 120”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had the minimum number of tillers or branches per meter square, 120.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse3
- Outcome
- number of tillers or branches per meter squaree3
- Direction
- minimume3
- Value
- 120e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e3“number of tillers or branches per meter square found maximum in T3: Stylo 159.80 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier 158.60 and minimum in T2: Para grass 120”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had the maximum green fodder yield, 860.16 q/ha.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had a green fodder yield of 438.77 q/ha, lower than Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse4
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde4
- Direction
- lowerinferrede4
- Value
- 438.77e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had the minimum green fodder yield, 194.65 q/ha.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe4
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde4
- Direction
- minimume4
- Value
- 194.65e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had the maximum dry fodder yield, 266.65 q/ha.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had a dry fodder yield of 122.86 q/ha, lower than Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse4
- Outcome
- dry fodder yielde4
- Direction
- lowerinferrede4
- Value
- 122.86e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had the minimum dry fodder yield, 36.98 q/ha.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe4
- Outcome
- dry fodder yielde4
- Direction
- minimume4
- Value
- 36.98e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e4“The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had the maximum net return, Rs. 75,660.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e5“The maximum net return was found in T1: Hybrid Napier Rs. 75,660 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 62.505 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 61,605”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had a net return of Rs. 62.505, lower than Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe5
- Outcome
- net returne5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede5
- Value
- Rs. 62.505e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e5“The maximum net return was found in T1: Hybrid Napier Rs. 75,660 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 62.505 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 61,605”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had the minimum net return, Rs. 61,605.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse5
- Outcome
- net returne5
- Direction
- minimume5
- Value
- Rs. 61,605e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e5“The maximum net return was found in T1: Hybrid Napier Rs. 75,660 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 62.505 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 61,605”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid Napier had the maximum benefit cost ratio, 2.86.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e6“The maximum B:C ratio was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 2.86 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 2.61 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 2.29”
Claim · model-written summary
Stylo had a benefit cost ratio of Rs. 2.61, lower than Hybrid Napier.
- Taxon
- Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
- Material
- Styloe6
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe6
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- Rs. 2.61e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e6“The maximum B:C ratio was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 2.86 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 2.61 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 2.29”
Claim · model-written summary
Para grass had the minimum benefit cost ratio, Rs. 2.29.
- Taxon
- Brachiaria muticaUrochloa muticae0
- Material
- Para grasse6
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe6
- Direction
- minimume6
- Value
- Rs. 2.29e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo)”
e6“The maximum B:C ratio was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 2.86 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 2.61 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 2.29”