Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of organic formulations on growth and yield of summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

SN Chaudhari; PH Patel; PR Chaudhari

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of organic formulations on growth and yield of summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.) during the year 2021 at Department of Seed Technology, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar. Twelve treatments combinations comprising of 75% RDF with foliar spray of vermiwash, matka khad, cow urine each @ 10% and panchgavya @ 4% at 30 and 45 DAS, foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% either with vermiwash, cow urine or matka khad @ 10% at 30 DAS, foliar spray of vermiwash either with matka khad or cow urine, all @ 10% at 30 DAS, foliar spray of cow urine and matka khad each @ 10% at 30 DAS, foliar spray of water at 30 and 45 DAS as well as 100% RDF were tested in Randomized Block Design replications on loamy sand soil. RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield. Considering the growth and yield parameter, it is concluded that should be applied with 75% RDF (15:30:00 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) and foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% along with either cow urine or vermiwash each @ 10% at 30 days after sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher plant height (69.90 cm).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
69.90 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher root nodules/plant (12.26).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
root nodules/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher days to 80% maturity (68.33).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
days to 80% maturitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
68.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher pods/plant (29.2).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
pods/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
29.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher seeds/pod (12.34).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
seeds/pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.34e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher seed (1987 kg/ha).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
highere0
Value
1987 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS produced significantly higher stover (4437 kg/ha).

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DASe0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
highere0
Value
4437 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“RDF (75%) with foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% and cow urine @ 10% at 30 DAS resulted in significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (69.90 cm), root nodules/plant (12.26) and days to 80% maturity (68.33) as well as yield attributes viz., pods/plant (29.2), seeds/pod (12.34), seed (1987 kg/ha) and stover (4437 kg/ha) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend 75% RDF plus panchgavya and either cow urine or vermiwash for greengram.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Outcome
75% RDF (15:30:00 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) and foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% along with either cow urine or vermiwash each @ 10% at 30 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Considering the growth and yield parameter, it is concluded that should be applied with 75% RDF (15:30:00 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) and foliar spray of panchgavya @ 4% along with either cow urine or vermiwash each @ 10% at 30 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1369 · show in text ↑

application · phenology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.