Paper · 2024 · Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology

The Protection of Tomatoes against the Fruit Blight and the Sustainability of Cultivars to the Pathogen (Phytophthora infestans)

Ismajl Cacaj; Nazmi Hasanaj

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This two-year research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of chemical preparations and the resistance of tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella) against the Phytophthora infestans pathogen causing fruit blight. Fungicides, including Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin, Mancozeb, and Copper, were tested in seven combinations, and disease assessments were conducted using the McKinney Index. Results from 2021 and 2022 consistently demonstrated that the combination of Azoxystrobin and Metalaxyl exhibited the highest efficiency in protecting both cultivars against Phytophthora infestans, with infection rates as low as 5.30% and 4.43%, respectively. In addition to fungicide effectiveness, cultivar resistance analysis revealed that Bella consistently displayed higher sustainability to the pathogen compared to Amati, with infection rates ranging from 4.43% to 6.30% for Bella, compared to 5.30% to 7.03% for Amati. This enhanced resistance in Bella was attributed to its smaller vegetative mass. The study underscores the importance of meticulous systemic fungicide use to prevent the development of pathogen resistance. Furthermore, the research recommends adjusting the frequency of sprayings based on climatic conditions to optimize blight management strategies. This research provides valuable insights into effective blight management strategies, highlighting specific fungicide combinations, and emphasizing the resistance characteristics of tomato cultivars. These findings contribute to the development of sustainable practices for protecting tomatoes against Phytophthora infestans, ultimately aiding in the cultivation of more resilient and disease-resistant tomato crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin plus Metalaxyl had the highest protection efficiency for Amati, with 5.30% infection.

Material
Amatie1
Treatment
combination of Azoxystrobin and Metalaxyle0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratese0
Direction
highest efficiencye0
Value
5.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of Azoxystrobin and Metalaxyl exhibited the highest efficiency in protecting both cultivars against Phytophthora infestans, with infection rates as low as 5.30% and 4.43%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin plus Metalaxyl had the highest protection efficiency for Bella, with 4.43% infection.

Material
Bellae1
Treatment
combination of Azoxystrobin and Metalaxyle0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratese0
Direction
highest efficiencye0
Value
4.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of Azoxystrobin and Metalaxyl exhibited the highest efficiency in protecting both cultivars against Phytophthora infestans, with infection rates as low as 5.30% and 4.43%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bella had higher resistance than Amati, with infection rates of 4.43% to 6.30%.

Material
Bellae0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
infection ratese0
Direction
higher sustainabilitye0
Value
4.43% to 6.30%e0
Qualifier
5.30% to 7.03%e0
Comparator
Amatie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bella consistently displayed higher sustainability to the pathogen compared to Amati, with infection rates ranging from 4.43% to 6.30% for Bella, compared to 5.30% to 7.03% for Amati”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytophthora infestans pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–179 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bella’s enhanced resistance was attributed to smaller vegetative mass.

Material
Bellae0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
enhanced resistancee0
Qualifier
smaller vegetative masse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This enhanced resistance in Bella was attributed to its smaller vegetative mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytophthora infestans pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–179 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend meticulous systemic fungicide use to prevent pathogen resistance.

Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
meticulous systemic fungicide use to prevent the development of pathogen resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“meticulous systemic fungicide use to prevent the development of pathogen resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytophthora infestans pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–179 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adjusting spray frequency to climatic conditions for blight management.

Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
adjusting the frequency of sprayings based on climatic conditions to optimize blight management strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adjusting the frequency of sprayings based on climatic conditions to optimize blight management strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars (Amati and Bella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytophthora infestans pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–179 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metalaxyl · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.