Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of integrated weed management onweed dynamics, yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max L.)

Basa Bharath Kalyan; Pradeep Kumar Kanaujiya; Pradeep Rajput; et al.

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment entitled "Effect of Integrated weed management on weed dynamics, yield and economics of Soybean (Glycine max L.)", was conducted at the Crop Research center, School of Agriculture, ITM University, Gwalior (M.P.), India during the kharif season of the year 2022.The experiment consisted of twelve treatments and three replications laid out in Randomized block design with the application of different pre and post emergence herbicides, along with two hand weeding's at 20 and 40 DAS and weedy check treatments.The herbicides were used individually as well as in sequence with hand weeding practices.All the weed control treatments showed significant reduction of weed flora, weed density and weed biomass as compared to weedy check.Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2 ), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2 ) and attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %), no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1 ) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1 ) and found at par with the post-emergence application of Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS) and Imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS).The maximum net returns and B-C ratio were recorded higher with Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings significantly reduced weed density in soybean compared with weedy check

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
significantly lesse1
Value
66.25 no.m -2e1
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings significantly reduced weed dry matter accumulation in soybean compared with weedy check

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
weed dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
significantly lesse1
Value
46.33 g m -2e1
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings attained higher weed control efficiency than weedy check in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye3
Direction
highere3
Value
81.53 %e3
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher number of pods per plant in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
no. of pods plant -1e4
Direction
highere3
Value
32.27e4
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 948–1070 · show in text ↑
e3

“attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher number of seeds per pod in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
no. of seeds pod -1e4
Direction
highere3
Value
3.07e4
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 948–1070 · show in text ↑
e3

“attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher grain yield in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere3
Value
2094 Kg ha -1e4
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 948–1070 · show in text ↑
e3

“attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher straw yield in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
straw yielde4
Direction
highere3
Value
2826.90 Kg ha -1e4
Comparator
weedy checke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 948–1070 · show in text ↑
e3

“attained the higher weed control efficiency (81.53 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–745 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave grain yield at par with post-emergence Imazethapyr + Imazamox in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
found at pare5
Comparator
post-emergence application of Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“found at par with the post-emergence application of Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1184 · show in text ↑
e4

“no. of pods plant -1 (32.27), no. of seeds pod -1 (3.07), grain yield (2094 Kg ha -1) and straw yield (2826.90 Kg ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 948–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly less the weed density (66.25 no.m -2), weed dry matter accumulation (46.33 g m -2)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 746–888 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr + Imazamox gave the highest net returns and B-C ratio in soybean

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Imazethapyr + Imazamoxe6
Outcome
net returns and B-C ratioe6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The maximum net returns and B-C ratio were recorded higher with Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i.ha -1 fb HW (at 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1358 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–127 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

85 papers: 66 positive, 19 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

imazamox · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.