Paper · 2024 · Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences

Genetic Diversity and Relationship among and within the Bird of Paradise Plants of Strelitziaceae and Heliconiaceae

Kholqiyah, Siti Faiqotul; Wahyudi, Didik; Hapsari, Lia

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bird of paradise plants belong to families Strelitziaceae and Heliconiaceae, two close-related families in the Zingiberales order. This study aimed to study the genetic diversity and relationship of species among and within Strelitziaceae and Heliconiaceae using molecular RAPD markers and compare them to morphological characters. Samples used comprised two species from Strelitziaceae and eight species from Heliconiaceae. Twenty OPA primers showed that 17 out of 20 OPA primers were successfully amplified. Primer OPA-10 was the most informative and recommended, followed by OPA-5, OPA-7, OPA-9, OPA-11, OPA-17, OPA-18, OPA-19, and OPA-20. Heliconiaceae and Strelitziaceae were high genetic diversity (P=100%, I=0.3880.016, He=0.2370.013) with low similarities (0.09-0.39). Heliconiaceae was more genetically diverse than Strelitziaceae. Heliconiaceae produced P=98.88%, I=0.4090.017, and He=0.2540.014. Strelitziaceae produced P=60.53%, I=0.3660.049, and He=0.2510.033. The tree topology based on the RAPD marker differs slightly from morphology. However, the morphological characteristics are important to support and complement it. Strelitziaceae was strongly separated from Heliconiaceae, which supports the monophyly of both families. Heliconiaceae was separated into two subclusters and paraphyletic. Subcluster 1 comprises subgenera Heliconia and Stenochlamys. Subcluster 2 comprises subgenera Griggsia and Stenochlamys. In conclusion, the molecular RAPD marker proved the powerful of classification at the family level but moderate at subgenus, section, and species levels. Nonetheless, it is considered a simple and valuable method to provide a primary reference for taxonomic delimitation, conservation and breeding efforts of the bird of paradise plants in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventeen of 20 OPA primers successfully amplified samples.

Outcome
OPA primers were successfully amplifiede0
Value
17 out of 20e0

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty OPA primers showed that 17 out of 20 OPA primers were successfully amplified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–509 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

OPA-10 was the most informative primer and was recommended.

Gene
Primer OPA-10e0
Outcome
most informative and recommendede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Primer OPA-10 was the most informative and recommended, followed by OPA-5, OPA-7, OPA-9, OPA-11, OPA-17, OPA-18, OPA-19, and OPA-20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two families showed high genetic diversity and low similarity.

Taxon
Heliconiaceae and StrelitziaceaeHeliconiaceaeStrelitziaceaee0
Outcome
high genetic diversitye0
Value
P=100%e0
Qualifier
low similarities (0.09-0.39)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Heliconiaceae and Strelitziaceae were high genetic diversity (P=100%, I=0.3880.016, He=0.2370.013) with low similarities (0.09-0.39).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heliconiaceae was more genetically diverse than Strelitziaceae.

Taxon
HeliconiaceaeHeliconiaceaee0
Outcome
genetically diversee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Strelitziaceaee0

Verbatim

e0

“Heliconiaceae was more genetically diverse than Strelitziaceae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heliconiaceae had P=98.88%, I=0.4090.017, and He=0.2540.014.

Taxon
HeliconiaceaeHeliconiaceaee0
Outcome
Pe0
Value
P=98.88%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Heliconiaceae produced P=98.88%, I=0.4090.017, and He=0.2540.014.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strelitziaceae had P=60.53%, I=0.3660.049, and He=0.2510.033.

Taxon
StrelitziaceaeStrelitziaceaee0
Outcome
Pe0
Value
P=60.53%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Strelitziaceae produced P=60.53%, I=0.3660.049, and He=0.2510.033.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD tree topology differed slightly from morphology.

Outcome
tree topologye0
Direction
differs slightlye0
Comparator
morphologye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The tree topology based on the RAPD marker differs slightly from morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strelitziaceae was strongly separated from Heliconiaceae, supporting monophyly of both families.

Taxon
StrelitziaceaeStrelitziaceaee0
Outcome
strongly separatede0
Comparator
Heliconiaceaee0

Verbatim

e0

“Strelitziaceae was strongly separated from Heliconiaceae, which supports the monophyly of both families.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heliconiaceae separated into two subclusters and was paraphyletic.

Taxon
HeliconiaceaeHeliconiaceaee0
Outcome
separated into two subclusters and paraphyletice0

Verbatim

e0

“Heliconiaceae was separated into two subclusters and paraphyletic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1309 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD markers were powerful for classification at family level but moderate at lower ranks.

Outcome
classificatione0
Qualifier
moderate at subgenus, section, and species levelse0
Comparator
family levele0

Verbatim

e0

“the molecular RAPD marker proved the powerful of classification at the family level but moderate at subgenus, section, and species levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1584 · show in text ↑