Paper · 2024 · Briefings in Bioinformatics

polyGBLUP: a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction improved the genomic prediction efficiency for autopolyploid species

Hailiang Song; Qin Zhang; Hongxia Hu

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Given the universality of autopolyploid species in nature, it is crucial to develop genomic selection methods that consider different allele dosages for autopolyploid breeding. However, no method has been developed to deal with autopolyploid data regardless of the ploidy level. In this study, we developed a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model (polyGBLUP) through constructing additive and dominant genomic relationship matrices based on different allele dosages. polyGBLUP could carry out genomic prediction for autopolyploid species regardless of the ploidy level. Through comprehensive simulations and analysis of real data of autotetraploid blueberry and guinea grass and autohexaploid sweet potato, the results showed that polyGBLUP achieved higher prediction accuracy than GBLUP and its superiority was more obvious when the ploidy level of autopolyploids is high. Furthermore, when the dominant effect was added to polyGBLUP (polyGDBLUP), the greater the dominance degree, the more obvious the advantages of polyGDBLUP over the diploid models in terms of prediction accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute error. For real data, the superiority of polyGBLUP over GBLUP appeared in blueberry and sweet potato populations and a part of the traits in guinea grass population due to the high correlation coefficients between diploid and polyploidy genomic relationship matrices. In addition, polyGDBLUP did not produce higher prediction accuracy than polyGBLUP for most traits of real data as dominant genetic variance was not captured for these traits. Our study will be a significant promising method for genomic prediction of autopolyploid species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGBLUP predicts autopolyploids regardless of ploidy level.

Taxon
autopolyploid speciese0
Outcome
genomic predictione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“polyGBLUP could carry out genomic prediction for autopolyploid species regardless of the ploidy level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–594 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGBLUP had higher prediction accuracy than GBLUP, especially at high ploidy.

Taxon
autopolyploidse0
Outcome
prediction accuracye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ploidy level of autopolyploids is highe0
Comparator
GBLUPe0

Verbatim

e0

“polyGBLUP achieved higher prediction accuracy than GBLUP and its superiority was more obvious when the ploidy level of autopolyploids is high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–898 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGDBLUP advantage over diploid models increased with dominance degree for accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute error.

Outcome
prediction accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute errore0
Direction
more obviouse0
Comparator
diploid modelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the greater the dominance degree, the more obvious the advantages of polyGDBLUP over the diploid models in terms of prediction accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute error.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1160 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGBLUP outperformed GBLUP in blueberry data.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Outcome
superioritye0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
GBLUPe0

Verbatim

e0

“the superiority of polyGBLUP over GBLUP appeared in blueberry and sweet potato populations and a part of the traits in guinea grass population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1318 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGBLUP outperformed GBLUP in sweet potato data.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
superioritye0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
GBLUPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the superiority of polyGBLUP over GBLUP appeared in blueberry and sweet potato populations and a part of the traits in guinea grass population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1318 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGBLUP outperformed GBLUP for some guinea grass traits.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Outcome
superioritye0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
GBLUPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the superiority of polyGBLUP over GBLUP appeared in blueberry and sweet potato populations and a part of the traits in guinea grass population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1318 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGDBLUP did not improve prediction accuracy for most real-data traits over polyGBLUP.

Outcome
prediction accuracye0
Direction
did not produce highere0
Qualifier
most traits of real datae0
Comparator
polyGBLUPe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“polyGDBLUP did not produce higher prediction accuracy than polyGBLUP for most traits of real data as dominant genetic variance was not captured for these traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1596 · show in text ↑