Paper · 2024 · Plant Methods

Improving the prediction performance of leaf water content by coupling multi-source data with machine learning in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Xuenan Zhang; Haocong Xu; Yehong She; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Leaf water content (LWC) significantly affects rice growth and development. Real-time monitoring of rice leaf water status is essential to obtain high yield and water use efficiency of rice plants with precise irrigation regimes in rice fields. Hyperspectral remote sensing technology is widely used in monitoring crop water status because of its rapid, nondestructive, and real-time characteristics. Recently, multi-source data have been attempted to integrate into a monitored model of crop water status based on spectral indices. However, there are fewer studies using spectral index model coupled with multi-source data for monitoring LWC in rice plants. Therefore, 2-year field experiments were conducted with three irrigation regimes using four rice cultivars in this study. The multi-source data, including canopy ecological factors and physiological parameters, were incorporated into the vegetation index to accurately predict LWC in rice plants. Results The results presented that the model accuracy of rice LWC estimation after combining data from multiple sources improved by 6–44% compared to the accuracy of a single spectral index normalized difference index (ND). Additionally, the optimal prediction accuracy of rice LWC was produced using a machine algorithm of gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT) based on the combination of ND (1287,1673) and crop water stress index (CWSI) (R 2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.01). Conclusions The machine learning estimation model constructed based on multi-source data fully utilizes the spectral information and considers the environmental changes in the crop canopy after introducing multi-source data parameters, thus improving the performance of spectral technology for monitoring rice LWC. The findings may be helpful to the water status diagnosis and accurate irrigation management of rice plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining multiple data sources improved rice leaf water content model accuracy by 6–44% against a single ND index.

Outcome
model accuracy of rice LWC estimatione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6–44%e0
Comparator
single spectral index normalized difference index (ND)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“model accuracy of rice LWC estimation after combining data from multiple sources improved by 6–44% compared to the accuracy of a single spectral index normalized difference index (ND)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1198 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A GBDT model using ND and CWSI produced optimal rice leaf water prediction accuracy with R2 of 0.86 and RMSE of 0.01.

Outcome
prediction accuracy of rice LWCe0
Direction
optimale0
Value
R 2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal prediction accuracy of rice LWC was produced using a machine algorithm of gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT) based on the combination of ND (1287,1673) and crop water stress index (CWSI) (R 2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1441 · show in text ↑