Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

Influence of Certain Ecological Factors on Seasonal Abundance of Key Insect Species existing on Sugar Beet Plants

Sara El - Fouly; Heba Ismail; S. S. M. Hassanein

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The current investigation aimed to assess the incidence and the population fluctuations of the main insect pests and associated predators on sugar beet plants and as well to determine their relation with temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, and mean numbers of leaves per plant at El-Hosinia district, Sharkia Governorate,Egypt during the two successive seasons of 2021/22 and 2022/23. The results revealed that Empoasca decipiens (Paoli) was the most dominant insect pest species constituting 51.72% of the general total numbers of pests. Moreover, it followed by Cicadulina chinai (Gauri), Pegomyia mixta (Vill.), and Myzus persicae (Sulzer), recording 34.61, 11.57, and 2.10%. The major predaceous species were Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (61.45%), and Coccinella undecimpunctata L. (38.55%). Statistical analysis proved that the combined effect of the tested ecological factors on the population activity of insect species was ranged from 36.47 to 64.14% in the first season and 56.76 and 92.62% in the second one. These findings would provide valuable knowledge for the researchers, farmers, and breeders of sugar beet in Egypt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Empoasca decipiens was the most dominant pest at 51.72% of total pest numbers.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Empoasca decipiens (Paoli)Hebata decipiense1pest
Outcome
Empoasca decipiens (Paoli)e1
Direction
most dominante1
Value
51.72%e1
Setting
El-Hosinia district, Sharkia Governorate,Egypte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Empoasca decipiens (Paoli) was the most dominant insect pest species constituting 51.72% of the general total numbers of pests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–549 · show in text ↑
e2

“El-Hosinia district, Sharkia Governorate,Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–337 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cicadulina chinai represented 34.61% of pests.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Cicadulina chinai (Gauri)e1pest
Outcome
Cicadulina chinai (Gauri)e1
Value
34.61e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“it followed by Cicadulina chinai (Gauri), Pegomyia mixta (Vill.), and Myzus persicae (Sulzer), recording 34.61, 11.57, and 2.10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–689 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pegomyia mixta represented 11.57% of pests.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Pegomyia mixta (Vill.)e1pest
Outcome
Pegomyia mixta (Vill.)e1
Value
11.57e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pegomyia mixta (Vill.), and Myzus persicae (Sulzer), recording 34.61, 11.57, and 2.10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–689 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myzus persicae represented 2.10% of pests.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Myzus persicae (Sulzer)Myzus persicaee1pest
Outcome
Myzus persicae (Sulzer)e1
Value
2.10%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Myzus persicae (Sulzer), recording 34.61, 11.57, and 2.10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–689 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysoperla carnea accounted for 61.45% of major predators.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.)Chrysoperla carneae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.)e1
Value
61.45%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“The major predaceous species were Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (61.45%), and Coccinella undecimpunctata L. (38.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coccinella undecimpunctata accounted for 38.55% of major predators.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Interactor
Coccinella undecimpunctata L.Coccinella undecimpunctatae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Coccinella undecimpunctata L.e1
Value
38.55%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coccinella undecimpunctata
Coccinella undecimpunctata · InteractorSteve Kerr · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Coccinella undecimpunctata L. (38.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–805 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested ecological factors jointly explained 36.47 to 64.14% of insect population activity in the first season.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment
tested ecological factorse1
Outcome
population activity of insect speciese1
Value
36.47 to 64.14%e1
Qualifier
first seasone1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined effect of the tested ecological factors on the population activity of insect species was ranged from 36.47 to 64.14% in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–988 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested ecological factors jointly explained 56.76 to 92.62% of insect population activity in the second season.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment
tested ecological factorse1
Outcome
population activity of insect speciese1
Value
56.76 and 92.62%e1
Qualifier
second onee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined effect of the tested ecological factors on the population activity of insect species was ranged from 36.47 to 64.14% in the first season and 56.76 and 92.62% in the second one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1028 · show in text ↑