Paper · 2023 · Энтомологическое обозрение

Development and harmfulness of the cabbage moth (Plutella xylostella (L.); Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) on the spring rape crops in Leningrad province

A. M Shpanev

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results of the long term research have shown that the cabbage moth causes a serious threat to spring rape plantings in Leningrad Province. During the last decade, there were several cases of mass reproduction of this species when high population density of the insect and heavy injury to the rape leaves and buds were recorded. Mass reproduction of the moth was observed in the early and warm spring, when the plantings were infested by the butter ies earlier and simultaneously, and the caterpillars were feeding on rape plants at the initial stages of their development that strongly reduced the crop yield. The situation was getting worse on rape that was sown late and was also damaged earlier by Phyllotreta ea beetles, and in the hot, dry weather. The crop yield of spring rape was decreased from damage caused by caterpillars according to the data averaged over the entire period of research by 4.7% (0.65 centner∙ha-1), in the years of mass reproduction, by 84%, and in the years of low population, by 2.5%. The harmfulness of cabbage moth caterpillars increased by 2.3 and 4.5 times when leaf area was damaged by 26-50% and more than 50%, respectively, as compared to when damage was low and not exceeding 25%. Application of full dose of mineral fertilizers decreased injury to the leaves and buds by cabbage moth caterpillars and harm caused to spring rape due to a higher plant potential to recover from the damage in icted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage moth caused a serious threat to spring rape plantings in Leningrad Province.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napuse0
Interactor
cabbage mothe0pest
Outcome
serious threate0
Setting
Leningrad Provincee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cabbage moth causes a serious threat to spring rape plantings in Leningrad Province.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass moth reproduction coincided with high populations and heavy injury to rape leaves and buds.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
cabbage motht0pest
Outcome
heavy injury to the rape leaves and budse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were several cases of mass reproduction of this species when high population density of the insect and heavy injury to the rape leaves and buds were recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage moth (Plutella xylostella (L.); Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) on the spring rape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early warm springs favored mass moth reproduction and initial-stage feeding reduced rape yield.

Taxon
rape plantsBrassica napuse0
Interactor
mothe0pest
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
strongly reducede0
Qualifier
early and warm springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mass reproduction of the moth was observed in the early and warm spring, when the plantings were infested by the butter ies earlier and simultaneously, and the caterpillars were feeding on rape plants at the initial stages of their development that strongly reduced the crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–609 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing, flea beetle injury and hot dry weather worsened the situation.

Treatment
sown latee0
Interactor
Phyllotreta ea beetlese0pest
Outcome
situation was getting worsee0
Direction
getting worsee0
Qualifier
hot, dry weathere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The situation was getting worse on rape that was sown late and was also damaged earlier by Phyllotreta ea beetles, and in the hot, dry weather.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillar damage decreased average spring rape yield by 4.7% across the study.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napuse0
Interactor
caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4.7% (0.65 centner∙ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop yield of spring rape was decreased from damage caused by caterpillars according to the data averaged over the entire period of research by 4.7% (0.65 centner∙ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillar damage decreased yield by 84% in mass reproduction years.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
cabbage motht0pest
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the years of mass reproduction, by 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crop yield of spring rape was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage moth (Plutella xylostella (L.); Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) on the spring rape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillar damage decreased yield by 2.5% in low-population years.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
cabbage motht0pest
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
2.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the years of low population, by 2.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crop yield of spring rape was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage moth (Plutella xylostella (L.); Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) on the spring rape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth harmfulness rose 2.3-fold with 26-50% leaf damage versus at most 25%.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
cabbage moth caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
harmfulness of cabbage moth caterpillarse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.3e0
Qualifier
26-50%e0
Comparator
damage was low and not exceeding 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The harmfulness of cabbage moth caterpillars increased by 2.3 and 4.5 times when leaf area was damaged by 26-50% and more than 50%, respectively, as compared to when damage was low and not exceeding 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth harmfulness rose 4.5-fold with over 50% leaf damage versus at most 25%.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
cabbage moth caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
harmfulness of cabbage moth caterpillarse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.5 timese0
Qualifier
more than 50%e0
Comparator
damage was low and not exceeding 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The harmfulness of cabbage moth caterpillars increased by 2.3 and 4.5 times when leaf area was damaged by 26-50% and more than 50%, respectively, as compared to when damage was low and not exceeding 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose mineral fertilizers decreased moth injury to rape leaves and buds.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
full dose of mineral fertilizerse0
Interactor
cabbage moth caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
injury to the leaves and buds by cabbage moth caterpillarse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of full dose of mineral fertilizers decreased injury to the leaves and buds by cabbage moth caterpillars and harm caused to spring rape due to a higher plant potential to recover from the damage in icted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose mineral fertilizers decreased harm to spring rape by increasing recovery potential.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
full dose of mineral fertilizerse0
Interactor
cabbage moth caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
harm caused to spring rapee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
higher plant potential to recover from the damagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of full dose of mineral fertilizers decreased injury to the leaves and buds by cabbage moth caterpillars and harm caused to spring rape due to a higher plant potential to recover from the damage in icted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1436 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · crop injury · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.