Abstract
White fly and other sucking insect pests are considered the minor pests of sugarcane in Punjab-Pakistan. But in the last few years, the white fly of sugarcane has become a major trouble for the sugarcane growers to handle and for sugar industries to extract proper sugar. A field trial was conducted at the seed farm of Kashmir Sugar Mills (Lat. 30.9370, Long. 72.1105). Treatments were comprised of crysopera eggs cards and insecticide(s). The insecticide(s) was sprayed with tractor mounted Jecto sprayer at the grand growth stage of autumn planted sugarcane (8th-month-old crop). Pre and post-spray population counts of whitefly were recorded. The results were compared with the control with a curved polar bar chart in R using the 'ggplot2' package. It was observed that drenching of chlorantraniloprole @ 250 ml/ha made an excellent control (~88%) and 24.2% over the control treatment. The 2nd most efficient control (86%) (22.7% over control) was recorded in a blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrin @ 1250 ml + 1000 ml/ha, respectively than the individual use of said insecticide (61% and 69%, respectively). Very hot and dry weather in the month of May in plains of Punjab Province-Pakistan did not support the Lab. reared crysoperla eggs cards @ 15000/ha in the field. But a large number of natural bio control agents worked well and surpassed some treatments in % mortality of whitefly
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniloprole drenching controlled whitefly by about 88% and 24.2% over control.
Verbatim
e0“drenching of chlorantraniloprole @ 250 ml/ha made an excellent control (~88%) and 24.2% over the control treatment”
t0“sugarcane”
t1“white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis)”
Claim · model-written summary
The pyriproxyfen and bifenthrin blend controlled whitefly by 86%, 22.7% over control.
Verbatim
e0“The 2nd most efficient control (86%) (22.7% over control) was recorded in a blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrin @ 1250 ml + 1000 ml/ha, respectively than the individual use of said insecticide (61% and 69%, respectively)”
t0“sugarcane”
t1“white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyriproxyfen alone controlled whitefly by 61%.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- pyriproxyfene0
- Interactor
- Aleurolobus barodensisAleurolobus barodensist1pest
- Outcome
- white flyt1
- Value
- 61%e0
- Comparator
- blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrine0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrin @ 1250 ml + 1000 ml/ha, respectively than the individual use of said insecticide (61% and 69%, respectively)”
t0“sugarcane”
t1“white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bifenthrin alone controlled whitefly by 69%.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- bifenthrine0
- Interactor
- Aleurolobus barodensisAleurolobus barodensist1pest
- Outcome
- white flyt1
- Value
- 69%e0
- Comparator
- blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrine0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“blend of pyriproxyfen + bifenthrin @ 1250 ml + 1000 ml/ha, respectively than the individual use of said insecticide (61% and 69%, respectively)”
t0“sugarcane”
t1“white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot, dry May weather did not support field use of lab-reared crysoperla egg cards.
Verbatim
e0“Very hot and dry weather in the month of May in plains of Punjab Province-Pakistan did not support the Lab. reared crysoperla eggs cards @ 15000/ha in the field”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural biocontrol agents surpassed some treatments in whitefly mortality.
Verbatim
e0“a large number of natural bio control agents worked well and surpassed some treatments in % mortality of whitefly”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
application · Aleurolobus barodensis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.