Paper · 2024 · Plants

Phenotypic Variability in Resistance to Anthracnose, White, Brown, and Blight Leaf Spot in Cassava Germplasm

José Henrique Bernardino Nascimento; Luciano Rogerio Braatz de Andrade; Saulo Alves Santos de Oliveira; et al.

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crantz) and causing significant yield losses, there is a lack of comprehensive studies assessing resistance in the species' germplasm. This study aimed to evaluate the phenotypic diversity for resistance to anthracnose disease (CAD), blight leaf spot (BliLS), brown leaf spot (BLS), and white leaf spot (WLS) in cassava germplasm and to identify genotypes suitable for breeding purposes. A total of 837 genotypes were evaluated under field conditions across two production cycles (2021 and 2022). Artificial inoculations were carried out in the field, and data on yield and disease severity were collected using a standardized rating scale. The top 25 cassava genotypes were selected based on a selection index for disease resistance and agronomic traits. High environmental variability resulted in low heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLS (h2 = 0.42, 0.34, 0.29, respectively) and moderate heritability for BliLS (h2 = 0.51). While the range of data for disease resistance was narrow, it was considerably wider for yield traits. Cluster analysis revealed that increased yield traits and disease severity were associated with higher scores of the first and second discriminant functions, respectively. Thus, most clusters comprised genotypes with hybrid characteristics for both traits. Overall, there was a strong correlation among aerial diseases, particularly between BLS and BliLS (r = 0.96), while the correlation between CAD and other diseases ranged from r = 0.53 to 0.58. Yield traits showed no significant correlations with disease resistance. Although the mean selection differential for disease resistance was modest (between -2.31% and -3.61%), selection based on yield traits showed promising results, particularly for fresh root yield (82%), dry root yield (39%), shoot yield (49%), and plant vigor (26%). This study contributes to enhancing genetic gains for resistance to major aerial part diseases and improving yield traits in cassava breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The top 25 cassava genotypes were selected for disease resistance and agronomic traits.

Material
cassava genotypese0
Outcome
selectede0
Value
25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top 25 cassava genotypes were selected based on a selection index for disease resistance and agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–754 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthracnose disease resistance had low heritability of 0.42.

Outcome
heritabilities (h2) for CADe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLS (h2 = 0.42, 0.34, 0.29, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“anthracnose disease (CAD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White leaf spot resistance had low heritability of 0.34.

Outcome
heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLSe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLS (h2 = 0.42, 0.34, 0.29, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown leaf spot resistance had low heritability of 0.29.

Outcome
heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLSe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low heritabilities (h2) for CAD, WLS, and BLS (h2 = 0.42, 0.34, 0.29, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blight leaf spot resistance had moderate heritability of 0.51.

Outcome
heritability for BliLSe0
Direction
moderatee0
Value
0.51e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate heritability for BliLS (h2 = 0.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease resistance varied over a narrow range.

Outcome
range of data for disease resistancee0
Direction
narrowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the range of data for disease resistance was narrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield traits varied over a wider range than disease resistance.

Outcome
yield traitse0
Direction
widere0
Comparator
disease resistancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was considerably wider for yield traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“the range of data for disease resistance was narrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher first discriminant-function scores were associated with increased yield traits.

Outcome
yield traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
firste0
Comparator
higher scorese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield traits and disease severity were associated with higher scores of the first and second discriminant functions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher second discriminant-function scores were associated with increased disease severity.

Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
higher scorese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield traits and disease severity were associated with higher scores of the first and second discriminant functions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most clusters had hybrid characteristics for yield traits and disease severity.

Outcome
hybrid characteristics for both traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most clusters comprised genotypes with hybrid characteristics for both traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown and blight leaf spot resistance were strongly correlated, with r = 0.96.

Outcome
correlation among aerial diseasese1
Value
r = 0.96e0
Comparator
BLS and BliLSe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“particularly between BLS and BliLS (r = 0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“strong correlation among aerial diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthracnose resistance correlated with other diseases at r = 0.53 to 0.58.

Outcome
correlation between CAD and other diseasese0
Value
r = 0.53 to 0.58e0
Comparator
other diseasese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the correlation between CAD and other diseases ranged from r = 0.53 to 0.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield traits were not significantly correlated with disease resistance.

Outcome
correlations with disease resistancee0
Comparator
Yield traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield traits showed no significant correlations with disease resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection differentials for disease resistance were modest, from -2.31% to -3.61%.

Outcome
mean selection differential for disease resistancee0
Value
between -2.31% and -3.61%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean selection differential for disease resistance was modest (between -2.31% and -3.61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection on fresh root yield gave an 82% differential.

Outcome
fresh root yielde0
Value
82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh root yield (82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection on dry root yield gave a 39% differential.

Outcome
dry root yielde0
Value
39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry root yield (39%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection on shoot yield gave a 49% differential.

Outcome
shoot yielde0
Value
49%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot yield (49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection on plant vigor gave a 26% differential.

Outcome
plant vigore0
Value
26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant vigor (26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑