Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram

Tej Pratap; Vishal Vikram Singh; Neeta Tripathi

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of fomesafen 11.1% w/w + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w (25% w/v SL) for control of complex weed flora in greengram and its residual effects on succeeding crop at GBPUA&T, Pantnagar during Kharif (rainy) season of 2017 and 2018. The results revealed that post-emergence application of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 250 and 312.5 g/ha being at par were found to be most effective in controlling all type of weeds in greengram. There were no phytotoxic symptoms due to any dose of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL. The highest grain yield (1.22 t/ha) was obtained with fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 312.5 g/ha closely followed by its lower dose250g/ha (1.21 t/ha) and two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (1.21 t/ha). Propaquizafop 10% EC at 100 g/ha and quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC at 50 g/ha kept as standard checks proved inferior.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen plus fluazifop-p-butyl at 250 g/ha was most effective for weed control in greengram.

Treatment
fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 250e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling all type of weedse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 250 and 312.5 g/ha being at par were found to be most effective in controlling all type of weeds in greengram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen plus fluazifop-p-butyl at 312.5 g/ha was most effective for weed control in greengram.

Treatment
fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 250 and 312.5 g/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling all type of weedse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 250 and 312.5 g/ha being at par were found to be most effective in controlling all type of weeds in greengram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–502 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested dose caused phytotoxic symptoms.

Treatment
fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SLe0
Outcome
no phytotoxic symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no phytotoxic symptoms due to any dose of fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 312.5 g/ha treatment yielded 1.22 t/ha, the highest grain yield.

Treatment
fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 312.5 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.22 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (1.22 t/ha) was obtained with fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 312.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 250 g/ha dose yielded 1.21 t/ha.

Treatment
lower dose250g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
closely followede0
Value
1.21 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (1.22 t/ha) was obtained with fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 312.5 g/ha closely followed by its lower dose250g/ha (1.21 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded 1.21 t/ha.

Treatment
two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
1.21 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (1.22 t/ha) was obtained with fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl 25% SL applied at 312.5 g/ha closely followed by its lower dose250g/ha (1.21 t/ha) and two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (1.21 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop at 100 g/ha was inferior.

Treatment
Propaquizafop 10% EC at 100 g/hae0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaquizafop 10% EC at 100 g/ha and quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC at 50 g/ha kept as standard checks proved inferior.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop-ethyl at 50 g/ha was inferior.

Treatment
quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC at 50 g/hae0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaquizafop 10% EC at 100 g/ha and quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC at 50 g/ha kept as standard checks proved inferior.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides for weed management in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑

fomesafen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fluazifop-P-butyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fluazifop-P-butyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fomesafen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.