Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Response of Sorghum bicolor genotypes for yield and yield components and organic carbon storage in the shoot and root systems

Asande Ngidi; Hussein Shimelis; Seltene Abady; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Sorghum is a vital food and feed crop in the world’s dry regions. Developing sorghum cultivars with high biomass production and carbon sequestration can contribute to soil health and crop productivity. The objective of this study was to assess agronomic performance, biomass production and carbon accumulation in selected sorghum genotypes for production and breeding. Fifty sorghum genotypes were evaluated at three locations (Silverton, Ukulinga, and Bethlehem) in South Africa during 2022 and 2023 growing seasons. Significant genotype × location ( p < 0.05) interactions were detected for days to 50% heading (DTH), days to 50% maturity (DTM), plant height (PH), total plant biomass (PB), shoot biomass (SB), root biomass (RB), root-to-shoot biomass ratio (RS), and grain yield (GY). The highest GY was recorded for genotypes AS115 (25.08 g plant −1 ), AS251 (21.83 g plant −1 ), and AS134 (21.42 g plant −1 ). Genotypes AS122 and AS27 ranked first and second, respectively, for all the carbon stock parameters except for root carbon stock (RCs), whereas genotype AS108 had the highest RCs of 8.87 g plant −1 . The principal component analysis identified GY, DTH, PH, PB, SB, RB, RCs, RCs/SCs, total plant carbon stock (PCs), shoot carbon stock (SCs), and grain carbon stock (GCs) as the most discriminated traits among the test genotypes. The cluster analysis using agronomic and carbon-related parameters delineated the test genotypes into three genetic groups, indicating marked genetic diversity for cultivar development and enhanced C storage and sustainable sorghum production. The selected sorghum genotypes are recommended for further breeding and variety release adapted to various agroecologies in South Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by location interactions were significant for heading, maturity, height, biomass and grain yield traits.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
genotype × locatione0
Value
p < 0.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant genotype × location ( p < 0.05) interactions were detected for days to 50% heading (DTH), days to 50% maturity (DTM), plant height (PH), total plant biomass (PB), shoot biomass (SB), root biomass (RB), root-to-shoot biomass ratio (RS), and grain yield (GY).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS115 had the highest listed grain yield at 25.08 g per plant.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS115e0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.08 g plant −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest GY was recorded for genotypes AS115 (25.08 g plant −1 ), AS251 (21.83 g plant −1 ), and AS134 (21.42 g plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS251 grain yield was 21.83 g per plant.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS251e0
Outcome
GYe1
Value
21.83 g plant −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AS251 (21.83 g plant −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest GY was recorded for genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS134 grain yield was 21.42 g per plant.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS134e0
Outcome
GYe1
Value
21.42 g plant −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AS134 (21.42 g plant −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest GY was recorded for genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS122 ranked first for carbon stock parameters except root carbon stock.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS122e0
Outcome
carbon stock parameterse0
Direction
firste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes AS122 and AS27 ranked first and second, respectively, for all the carbon stock parameters except for root carbon stock (RCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS27 ranked second for carbon stock parameters except root carbon stock.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS27e0
Outcome
carbon stock parameterse0
Direction
seconde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes AS122 and AS27 ranked first and second, respectively, for all the carbon stock parameters except for root carbon stock (RCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS108 had the highest root carbon stock at 8.87 g per plant.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
AS108e0
Outcome
RCse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.87 g plant −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype AS108 had the highest RCs of 8.87 g plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA identified grain yield, heading, height, biomass and carbon traits as most discriminating among genotypes.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
most discriminated traitse0
Comparator
test genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The principal component analysis identified GY, DTH, PH, PB, SB, RB, RCs, RCs/SCs, total plant carbon stock (PCs), shoot carbon stock (SCs), and grain carbon stock (GCs) as the most discriminated traits among the test genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis divided the sorghum genotypes into three genetic groups.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
three genetic groupse0
Value
three genetic groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cluster analysis using agronomic and carbon-related parameters delineated the test genotypes into three genetic groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selected genotypes are recommended for further breeding and variety release in South Africa.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
further breeding and variety releasee0
Setting
South Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The selected sorghum genotypes are recommended for further breeding and variety release adapted to various agroecologies in South Africa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1734 · show in text ↑