Abstract
Applying organic manures is crucial for optimal radish growth and yield due to their rich nutrient content, soil-enriching properties and ability to foster beneficial microbial activity, all of which contribute to healthier plants and improved harvests. A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of different liquid organic manures on growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus) at organic farming block of Zonal Agricultural Research Station, V. C. Farm, Mandya during late Kharif 2020. The experiment was laid in Randomized Complete Block Design with nine treatments and three replications. The experiment consisted of nine treatments of three different levels of nitrogen was applied through FYM and different times of application of Panchagavya and Jeevamrutha. A significant variation was observed among the treatments. The 75% RDN through FYM + two time application of Panchagavya significantly increased the growth and yield attributes at 15, 30, 45 DAS and at harvest viz., plant height (8.39, 18.25, 28.16 and 33.06 cm), number of leaves per plant (6.22, 9.11, 16.04 and 18.43), leaf area index (0.08, 0.46, 0.70 and 1.01), root diameter (5.43cm at harvest), fresh shoot weight (8.53, 51.31, 115.29 and 132.43 g plant-1), fresh root weight (2.99, 61.19, 161.08 and 213.08 g plant-1), dry shoot weight (1.11, 10.76, 22.01 and 30.49 g plant-1), dry root weight (0.90, 13.13, 26.74 and 43.28 g plant-1), root yield (38.38 t ha-1) and shoot yield (30.26 t ha-1). In total, the results suggested that 75 per cent recommended dosage of nitrogen was applied through FYM with two times application of panchagavya is proved to be conducive for radish cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments differed significantly.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativust0 - Outcome
- variatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant variation was observed among the treatments.”
t0“Radish”
Claim · model-written summary
The specified FYM plus Panchagavya treatment increased plant height at 15, 30, 45 DAS and harvest.
- Taxon
- radishRaphanus sativust0
- Treatment
- 75% RDN through FYM + two time application of Panchagavyae0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.39, 18.25, 28.16 and 33.06 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 75% RDN through FYM + two time application of Panchagavya significantly increased the growth and yield attributes at 15, 30, 45 DAS and at harvest viz., plant height (8.39, 18.25, 28.16 and 33.06 cm)”
t0“Radish”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment increased leaf number across the reported stages.
- Taxon
- radishRaphanus sativust0
- Treatment
- 75% RDN through FYM + two time application of Panchagavyae0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.22, 9.11, 16.04 and 18.43e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 75% RDN through FYM + two time application of Panchagavya significantly increased the growth and yield attributes at 15, 30, 45 DAS and at harvest viz., plant height (8.39, 18.25, 28.16 and 33.06 cm), number of leaves per plant (6.22, 9.11, 16.04 and 18.43)”
t0“Radish”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
108 papers more in this group
See all 112 papers →fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.