Paper · 2024 · Weed Science

Effects of bed width and crop row spacing on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) emergence and seed production in furrow-irrigated rice

Noah H. Reed; Thomas R. Butts; Jason K. Norsworthy; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Furrow-irrigated rice ( Oryza sativa L.) has become a popular option for rice production in Arkansas. Highly troublesome weeds like barnyardgrass [ Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.] are a major problem for producers in all rice production systems. Cultural tactics should become a priority to enhance crop growth and competitiveness. This research aimed to determine the effects of bed width (irrigation furrow spacing) and crop row spacing manipulation on E. crus-galli emergence and seed production in a furrow-irrigated rice system. Three bed widths (76, 97, and 152 cm) (whole-plot factor) were used, and plots were drill seeded in four crop row spacings (13, 19, 25, and 38 cm) (subplot factor). The widest width of 152 cm had a slight increase in E. crus-galli density in the early rice life cycle but, by the end of the season, did not differ from the narrower bed widths. Conversely, a decrease in E. crus-galli seed production was observed as the bed width increased. Similar rice canopy coverage and yields occurred among all three bed widths. As for crop row spacing, as the width increased, E. crus-galli density also increased. The 13-cm crop row spacing had the lowest preflood E. crus-galli density, preharvest panicle count, and seed production. No effect of crop row spacing was observed on rice canopy coverage; however, the 13-cm crop row spacing produced the greatest rice yield. The 13-cm crop row spacing paired with the 152-cm bed width may be the optimum combination of ecological strategies in furrow-irrigated rice to reduce E. crus-galli seed production while maintaining rice growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 152 cm bed width slightly increased early E. crus-galli density.

Organ / stage
early rice life cyclee0
Treatment
152 cme0
Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
E. crus-galli densitye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
widest widthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“The widest width of 152 cm had a slight increase in E. crus-galli density in the early rice life cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By season end, E. crus-galli density at the widest bed width did not differ from narrower widths.

Treatment
narrower bed widthse0
Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie1weed
Outcome
E. crus-galli densitye1
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
narrower bed widthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“by the end of the season, did not differ from the narrower bed widths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“E. crus-galli density in the early rice life cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–817 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. crus-galli seed production decreased as bed width increased.

Treatment
bed widthe0
Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
E. crus-galli seed productione0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“a decrease in E. crus-galli seed production was observed as the bed width increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice canopy coverage and yields were similar among three bed widths.

Treatment
three bed widthse0
Outcome
rice canopy coverage and yieldse0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
all three bed widthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar rice canopy coverage and yields occurred among all three bed widths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. crus-galli density increased with wider crop row spacing.

Treatment
widthe0
Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
E. crus-galli densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“as the width increased, E. crus-galli density also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-cm row spacing had the lowest preflood E. crus-galli density, preharvest panicle count, and seed production.

Treatment
13-cm crop row spacinge0
Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
preflood E. crus-galli density, preharvest panicle count, and seed productione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 13-cm crop row spacing had the lowest preflood E. crus-galli density, preharvest panicle count, and seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop row spacing did not affect rice canopy coverage.

Treatment
crop row spacinge0
Outcome
rice canopy coveragee0
Direction
No effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effect of crop row spacing was observed on rice canopy coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-cm row spacing produced the greatest rice yield.

Treatment
13-cm crop row spacinge0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 13-cm crop row spacing produced the greatest rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combining 13-cm row spacing with 152-cm bed width to reduce weed seed production while maintaining rice growth and yield.

Interactor
E. crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
13-cm crop row spacing paired with the 152-cm bed widthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 13-cm crop row spacing paired with the 152-cm bed width may be the optimum combination of ecological strategies in furrow-irrigated rice to reduce E. crus-galli seed production while maintaining rice growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1635 · show in text ↑

density · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

density · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 73 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.