Paper · 2024 · Discover Sustainability

Seedbed management, transplanting methods and irrigation regimes influence the growth, productivity and economics of summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Mousumi Mondal; Benukar Biswas; Sourav Garai; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted during the rabi (winter) seasons of 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 at the Central Research Farm under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India, to study the effects of planting techniques, irrigation regimes, and nursery bed management on the growth, yield, nutrient dynamics, water productivity, and economics of summer rice (cv. Shatabdi) production. The experiment was performed in a strip-split plot design with twelve treatment combinations, which were replicated three times. The design consisted of two types of transplanted rice establishment methods (viz., puddled transplanted rice (PTR) and nonpuddled transplanted rice (NPTR)) allocated to the main plot, three irrigation regimes (three-day intervals; six-day intervals; nine-day intervals) allocated to the subplot, and two nursery bed management practices (conventional seedbed and improved seedbed) allocated to the subplot. Higher growth attributes, such as plant height, tiller count, biomass, and LAI, were found under nonpuddled conditions at the time of harvesting. Similarly, a three-day irrigation interval and improved seedlings led to better growth traits. The yield attributes and yield varied nonsignificantly among the crop establishment methods. However, the lowest irrigation intervals accounted for 53.78% and 43.02% greater grain yield than did the nine-day intervals in two consecutive years, respectively, and produced statistically similar yields with six-day intervals. The percentage of seedlings transplanted from improved seedbeds was 4.01 and 4.13% greater than that from conventional seedlings. A similar trend was observed for both input and irrigation water productivity, except that the nine-day irrigation interval resulted in significantly greater water productivity than did the other intervals. The treatment consisted of nonpuddled transplanted rice along with six six-day irrigation intervals and improved seedbed management, resulting in the highest net return and benefit:cost ratio due to the low production cost. Thus, it can be concluded that transplanting seedlings into nonpuddled soil from an improved seedbed with intermittent irrigation might be the most judicious and recommended in terms of productivity as well as profitability for summer rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpuddled transplantation produced higher plant height, tiller count and biomass at harvest.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
nonpuddled conditionse0
Outcome
plant height, tiller count, biomasse0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
at the time of harvestinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher growth attributes, such as plant height, tiller count, biomass, and LAI, were found under nonpuddled conditions at the time of harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpuddled transplantation produced higher LAI at harvest.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
nonpuddled conditionse0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher growth attributes, such as plant height, tiller count, biomass, and LAI, were found under nonpuddled conditions at the time of harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three-day irrigation interval improved growth traits.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
a three-day irrigation intervale0
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, a three-day irrigation interval and improved seedlings led to better growth traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved seedlings improved growth traits.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
improved seedlingse0
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, a three-day irrigation interval and improved seedlings led to better growth traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes and yield did not differ significantly between establishment methods.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
crop establishment methodse0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
varied nonsignificantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes and yield varied nonsignificantly among the crop establishment methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shortest irrigation interval increased grain yield by 53.78% over nine-day intervals in one year.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
the lowest irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
53.78%e0
Qualifier
in two consecutive yearse0
Comparator
the nine-day intervalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest irrigation intervals accounted for 53.78% and 43.02% greater grain yield than did the nine-day intervals in two consecutive years, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shortest irrigation interval increased grain yield by 43.02% over nine-day intervals in the second year.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
the lowest irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
43.02%e0
Qualifier
in two consecutive yearse0
Comparator
the nine-day intervalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest irrigation intervals accounted for 53.78% and 43.02% greater grain yield than did the nine-day intervals in two consecutive years, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The shortest and six-day irrigation intervals had statistically similar yields.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
six-day intervalse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced statistically similar yields with six-day intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved seedbeds increased the percentage of seedlings transplanted by 4.01%.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
improved seedbedse0
Outcome
percentage of seedlings transplantede0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4.01e0
Comparator
conventional seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of seedlings transplanted from improved seedbeds was 4.01 and 4.13% greater than that from conventional seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved seedbeds increased the percentage of seedlings transplanted by 4.13%.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
improved seedbedse0
Outcome
percentage of seedlings transplantede0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4.13%e0
Comparator
conventional seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of seedlings transplanted from improved seedbeds was 4.01 and 4.13% greater than that from conventional seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine-day irrigation produced significantly greater water productivity than other intervals.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
the nine-day irrigation intervale0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the other intervalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nine-day irrigation interval resulted in significantly greater water productivity than did the other intervals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpuddled transplanting with six-day irrigation and improved seedbeds had the highest net return and benefit:cost ratio.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
nonpuddled transplanted rice along with six six-day irrigation intervals and improved seedbed managemente0
Outcome
net return and benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
due to the low production coste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nonpuddled transplanted rice along with six six-day irrigation intervals and improved seedbed management, resulting in the highest net return and benefit:cost ratio due to the low production cost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2066 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nonpuddled transplantation from improved seedbeds with intermittent irrigation for productivity and profitability.

Taxon
summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
transplanting seedlings into nonpuddled soil from an improved seedbed with intermittent irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transplanting seedlings into nonpuddled soil from an improved seedbed with intermittent irrigation might be the most judicious and recommended in terms of productivity as well as profitability for summer rice production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2098–2318 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.