Paper · 2024 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Identifying limiting nutrient(s) for better bread wheat and tef productivity in acidic soils of north‐west Amhara, Ethiopia

Zerfu Bazie; Tadele Amare; Erkihun Alemu; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Food crop productivity is still low because of the decline of soil fertility in Ethiopia, particularly in north‐western Amhara. Fine‐tuning the source and rate of nutrients is required to solve soil fertility problems along landscape positions. Therefore, this study was initiated to investigate the need to apply selected nutrients to tef and wheat in acidic soils. This nutrient omission study was conducted in 74 farmers’ fields of Gozamen and Machakel districts. The omitted nutrients were sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B). Potassium (K) was added, consisting of N, P, K, S, Zn, and B (All+K). Nitrogen plus phosphorus (NP) and no fertilizer treatments were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Furthermore, 50% and 150% of the All+K treatments were also included. The finding revealed that the application of different nutrient types at variable rates had a significant role in the grain and biomass yield of both test crops in the acidic soils. No tef yield and the lowest yield of bread wheat were obtained from the no fertilizer application treatment. The application of All+K had no significant yield advantage compared to NP fertilizer alone. This implies that N and P are the most yield‐limiting nutrients to produce tef and bread wheat, whereas KSZnB nutrients are not yield limiting. Therefore, refining the rates of N and P in acidic soils is needed for the economical use of fertilizers. Finally, applying blended fertilizers without empirical evidence is not recommended for smallholder farmers in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application rates and types significantly affected grain and biomass yield of tef.

Treatment
different nutrient types at variable ratese0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“application of different nutrient types at variable rates had a significant role in the grain and biomass yield of both test crops in the acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application rates and types significantly affected grain and biomass yield of wheat.

Treatment
different nutrient types at variable ratese0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“application of different nutrient types at variable rates had a significant role in the grain and biomass yield of both test crops in the acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tef yield was obtained without fertilizer.

Treatment
no fertilizer application treatmente0
Outcome
tef yielde0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tef yield and the lowest yield of bread wheat were obtained from the no fertilizer application treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The no-fertilizer treatment produced the lowest bread wheat yield.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
no fertilizer application treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tef yield and the lowest yield of bread wheat were obtained from the no fertilizer application treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All+K gave no significant yield advantage over NP fertilizer.

Treatment
All+Ke0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
no significant yield advantagee0
Comparator
NP fertilizer alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The application of All+K had no significant yield advantage compared to NP fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1181 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify nitrogen and phosphorus as the most yield-limiting nutrients for tef.

Treatment
N and Pe0
Outcome
most yield‐limiting nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N and P are the most yield‐limiting nutrients to produce tef and bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify nitrogen and phosphorus as the most yield-limiting nutrients for bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and Pe0
Outcome
most yield‐limiting nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N and P are the most yield‐limiting nutrients to produce tef and bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSZnB nutrients were interpreted as not yield limiting.

Treatment
KSZnB nutrientse0
Outcome
not yield limitinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“KSZnB nutrients are not yield limiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend refining nitrogen and phosphorus rates in acidic soils.

Outcome
refining the rates of N and P in acidic soilse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“refining the rates of N and P in acidic soils is needed for the economical use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1431 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against blended fertilizer application without empirical evidence for local smallholders.

Outcome
applying blended fertilizers without empirical evidence is not recommendede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“applying blended fertilizers without empirical evidence is not recommended for smallholder farmers in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1558 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Eragrostis tef (tef)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.