Paper · 2024 · Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery

Diversity of the Ground Cover Crop Nephrolepis Biserrata in Oil Palm Plantations on Various Soil Types

Fadri T. Sibarani; Akhmad R. Saidy; Bambang J. Priatmadi; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ground cover crops play an important role in maintaining the ecological balance in oil palm plantations. Nephrolepis biserrata, as a cover crop species, has not been extensively studied, especially in relation to soil type and vegetation level. This study aimed to analyze the distribution and dominance of Nephrolepis biserrata in oil palm plantations on various soil and vegetation levels. This quantitative research was conducted in oil palm plantations in Central Kalimantan Province using a survey method with purposive sampling. Nine treatment combinations of three soil types (Histosols, Ultisols, and Spodosols) and three vegetation levels (low, medium, and high) were tested on 81 test plots. Data analysis includes diversity index (Ĥ), uniformity index (E), dominance index (C), importance value index (INP), and relative dominance (DR). The results of the research show that N. biserrata has good adaptability and dominance as a ground cover crop in the producing crop (TM) phase in oil palm plantations, especially on Spodosol-type soils. Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%). There are no cover crop species that dominate exclusively in all soil types (0.078-0.185). Ultisols have high cover crop diversity (3,107), whereas Spodosols (2,130) and Histosols (2,595) have medium diversity. Ageratum conyzoides (15.08%) and Paspalum dilatatum (10.06%) also had significant INP in all soil types. Different soil conditions influence the number of cover crop vegetation species and communities in oil palm plantations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. biserrata adapted and dominated especially on Spodosols.

Taxon
N. biserrataNephrolepis biserratae0
Outcome
good adaptability and dominancee0
Setting
Spodosol-type soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis biserrata
Nephrolepis biserrata · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. biserrata has good adaptability and dominance as a ground cover crop in the producing crop (TM) phase in oil palm plantations, especially on Spodosol-type soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. exaltata INP in Ultisols was 76.65%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis exaltataNephrolepis exaltatae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
76.65%e0
Setting
Ultisolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis exaltata
Nephrolepis exaltata · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. biserrata INP in Ultisols was 7.64%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis biserrataNephrolepis biserratae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
7.64%e0
Setting
Ultisolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis biserrata
Nephrolepis biserrata · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. exaltata INP in Spodosols was 48.03%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis exaltataNephrolepis exaltatae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
48.03%e0
Setting
Spodosolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis exaltata
Nephrolepis exaltata · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. biserrata INP in Spodosols was 82.75%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis biserrataNephrolepis biserratae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
82.75%e0
Setting
Spodosolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis biserrata
Nephrolepis biserrata · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. exaltata INP in Histosols was 61.34%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis exaltataNephrolepis exaltatae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
61.34%e0
Setting
Histosolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis exaltata
Nephrolepis exaltata · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. biserrata INP in Histosols was 23.98%.

Taxon
Nephrolepis biserrataNephrolepis biserratae0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
23.98%e0
Setting
Histosolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nephrolepis biserrata
Nephrolepis biserrata · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nephrolepis exaltata and Nephrolepis biserrata showed the highest INP in Ultisols (76.65%; 7.64%), Spodosols (48.03%; 82.75%), and Histosols (61.34%; 23.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cover crop dominated every soil type.

Taxon
cover crop speciese0
Outcome
dominate exclusively in all soil typese0
Value
0.078-0.185e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There are no cover crop species that dominate exclusively in all soil types (0.078-0.185)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultisols had high cover crop diversity of 3,107.

Taxon
cover crope0
Outcome
diversitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
3,107e0
Setting
Ultisolse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ultisols have high cover crop diversity (3,107), whereas Spodosols (2,130) and Histosols (2,595) have medium diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spodosols had medium diversity of 2,130.

Taxon
cover crope0
Outcome
diversitye0
Direction
mediume0
Value
2,130e0
Setting
Spodosolse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ultisols have high cover crop diversity (3,107), whereas Spodosols (2,130) and Histosols (2,595) have medium diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Histosols had medium diversity of 2,595.

Taxon
cover crope0
Outcome
diversitye0
Direction
mediume0
Value
2,595e0
Setting
Histosolse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ultisols have high cover crop diversity (3,107), whereas Spodosols (2,130) and Histosols (2,595) have medium diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ageratum conyzoides had significant INP of 15.08%.

Taxon
Ageratum conyzoidesAgeratum conyzoidese0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
15.08%e0
Setting
all soil typese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratum conyzoides
Ageratum conyzoides · TaxonMinghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ageratum conyzoides (15.08%) and Paspalum dilatatum (10.06%) also had significant INP in all soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paspalum dilatatum had significant INP of 10.06%.

Taxon
Paspalum dilatatumPaspalum dilatatume0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
10.06%e0
Setting
all soil typese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum dilatatum
Paspalum dilatatum · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ageratum conyzoides (15.08%) and Paspalum dilatatum (10.06%) also had significant INP in all soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1524 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil conditions influenced ground-cover species number and communities.

Taxon
cover crop vegetation speciese0
Outcome
number of cover crop vegetation species and communitiese0
Setting
oil palm plantationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Different soil conditions influence the number of cover crop vegetation species and communities in oil palm plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1645 · show in text ↑