Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Bacterial and fungal communities regulated directly and indirectly by tobacco-rape rotation promote tobacco production

Lu Liu; Qi Miao; Yingxin Guo; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tobacco continuous cropping is prevalent in intensive tobacco agriculture but often leads to microbial community imbalance, soil nutrient deficiency, and decreased crop productivity. While the tobacco-rape rotation has demonstrated significant benefits in increasing tobacco yield. Microorganisms play a crucial role in soil nutrient cycling and crop productivity. However, the internal mechanism of tobacco-rape rotation affecting tobacco yield through microbe-soil interaction is still unclear. In this study, two treatments, tobacco continuous cropping (TC) and tobacco-rape rotation (TR) were used to investigate how planting systems affect soil microbial diversity and community structure, and whether these changes subsequently affect crop yields. The results showed that compared with TC, TR significantly increased the Shannon index, Chao1 index, ACE index of bacteria and fungi, indicating increased microbial α-diversity. On the one hand, TR may directly affect the bacterial and fungal community structure due to the specificity of root morphology and root exudates in rape. Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the proportion of beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa while significantly reduced soil-borne pathogens. Additionally, TR enhanced the scale and complexity of microbial co-occurrence networks, promoting potential synergies between bacterial OTUs. On the other hand, TR indirectly changed microbial community composition by improving soil chemical properties and changing microbial life history strategies. Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the relative abundance of copiotrophs while reduced oligotrophs. Notably, TR significantly increased tobacco yield by 39.6% compared with TC. The relationships among yield, microbial community and soil chemical properties indicated that planting systems had the greatest total effect on tobacco yield, and the microbial community, particularly bacteria, had the greatest direct effect on tobacco yield. Our findings highlighted the potential of tobacco-rape rotation to increase yield by both directly and indirectly optimizing microbial community structure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased bacterial and fungal alpha diversity indices relative to continuous tobacco.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
bacteria and fungiBacteriaFungie0symbiont
Outcome
Shannon index, Chao1 index, ACE index of bacteria and fungie0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with TC, TR significantly increased the Shannon index, Chao1 index, ACE index of bacteria and fungi, indicating increased microbial α-diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
bacterial and fungal taxae0symbiont
Outcome
proportion of beneficial bacterial and fungal taxae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the proportion of beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation reduced soil-borne pathogens.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
soil-borne pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
soil-borne pathogense0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the proportion of beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa while significantly reduced soil-borne pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased microbial network scale and complexity.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
microbiale0symbiont
Outcome
scale and complexity of microbial co-occurrence networkse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TR enhanced the scale and complexity of microbial co-occurrence networks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased copiotroph abundance.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
copiotrophse0other
Outcome
relative abundance of copiotrophse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the relative abundance of copiotrophs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation reduced oligotrophs.

Treatment
TRe0
Interactor
oligotrophse0other
Outcome
oligotrophse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with TC, TR significantly increased the relative abundance of copiotrophs while reduced oligotrophs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco-rape rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased tobacco yield by 39.6% relative to continuous cropping.

Treatment
TRe0
Outcome
tobacco yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.6%e0
Comparator
TCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TR significantly increased tobacco yield by 39.6% compared with TC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1722 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting systems had the greatest total effect on tobacco yield in the relationship analysis.

Treatment
planting systemse0
Outcome
tobacco yielde0
Direction
greatest total effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting systems had the greatest total effect on tobacco yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1882 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The microbial community, especially bacteria, had the greatest direct effect on tobacco yield.

Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
tobacco yielde0
Direction
greatest direct effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the microbial community, particularly bacteria, had the greatest direct effect on tobacco yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–1983 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

rotation · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.