Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Effect of Planting Methods and Weed Control Treatments on Weed Dynamics, Yield and Economics of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Chitrangada Parihar; Shailendra Singh Kushwah; Bharti Parmar; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, College of Agriculture, Gwalior (M.P.), during the 2019 kharif season to investigate the effects of different planting methods and weed control treatments on the weeds, growth, yield, and economics of green gram. The field experiment followed a split-plot design with three planting methods as main plot treatments (broadcasting on a flat bed, line sowing on a flat bed, and ridge and furrow) and five weed management practices as sub-plot treatments (Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha, Diclosulam 26 g/ha, Imazethapyr 75 g/ha, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and weedy check), replicated thrice. The experimental field was primarily infested with narrow-leaved weeds such as Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Echinochloa spp., and Dactyloctenium aegyptium, and broad-leaved weeds like Digera arvensis, Celosia argentea, Commelina benghalensis, and Phyllanthus niruri. Among the herbicidal treatments, Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha effectively controlled both narrow-leaved and broad-leaved weeds, resulting in the lowest weed index. The ridge and furrow planting method recorded the highest values in growth parameters, yield attributes, and seed yield, proving to be more remunerative compared to other methods. These findings indicate that the combination of ridge and furrow planting with effective weed management, particularly using Imazethapyr, optimizes green gram productivity and economic returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha gave the lowest weed index among the herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
Imazethapyr at 75 g/hae1
Interactor
narrow-leaved and broad-leaved weedse1weed
Outcome
weed indexe1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
herbicidal treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among the herbicidal treatments, Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha effectively controlled both narrow-leaved and broad-leaved weeds, resulting in the lowest weed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting recorded the highest growth parameters, yield attributes and seed yield compared with other methods.

Treatment
ridge and furrow planting methode2
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes, and seed yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
other methodse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The ridge and furrow planting method recorded the highest values in growth parameters, yield attributes, and seed yield, proving to be more remunerative compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting was more remunerative than other planting methods.

Treatment
ridge and furrow planting methode2
Outcome
remunerativee2
Direction
more remunerativee2
Comparator
other methodse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The ridge and furrow planting method recorded the highest values in growth parameters, yield attributes, and seed yield, proving to be more remunerative compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting combined with Imazethapyr weed management optimises green gram productivity and economic returns.

Outcome
green gram productivity and economic returnse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“These findings indicate that the combination of ridge and furrow planting with effective weed management, particularly using Imazethapyr, optimizes green gram productivity and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.