Paper · 2024 · Microorganisms

Structure and Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Maize Seeds and Germinating Roots

Yang Gao; Yujun Zhang; Puchang Wang; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seed endophytes in maize, which facilitate the transmission of microorganisms from one plant generation to the next, may play a crucial role in plant protection and growth promotion. This study aimed to investigate the effects of various maize varieties on the communities of endophytic bacteria in seeds and germinating roots. This study utilized Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology to examine the structural and diversity differences of endophytic bacterial communities within seed maize (BY1507), silage maize (QQ446), and wild maize (Teosinte) in both seeds and germinating roots. The results showed that 416 bacterial genera were detected, with Pantoea, Lachnospiraceae, Pararhizobium, Enterobacteriaceae, Stenotrophomonas, and Pseudonocardia being the most prevalent (relative abundance > 10%) at the genus level. No significant difference was observed in diversity indices (Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson) of seed endophytes among BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte. The Shannon and Simpson indices for the germinating root endophyte from the wild variety (Teosinte) were significantly higher than the domesticated varieties (BY1507 and QQ446). PCoA revealed a notable overlap in the endophytic bacterial communities from the seeds of BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte. Yet, clustering patterns were found. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte share a notable proportion of shared endophytic bacteria (>30%) between the seeds and germinating roots. This investigation elucidates the characteristics of endophytic microbial communities of seeds and germinating roots with seed maize, silage maize, and wild maize, offering data for future research on the physiological ecological adaptation of these endophytic microbial communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize seed and root samples contained 416 bacterial genera.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
Seeds and Germinating Rootst0
Outcome
bacterial generae0
Value
416 bacterial generae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Seeds and Germinating Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“416 bacterial genera were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pantoea, Lachnospiraceae, Pararhizobium, Enterobacteriaceae, Stenotrophomonas, and Pseudonocardia were most prevalent, above 10% relative abundance.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
Seeds and Germinating Rootst0
Outcome
most prevalente0
Value
> 10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Seeds and Germinating Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pantoea, Lachnospiraceae, Pararhizobium, Enterobacteriaceae, Stenotrophomonas, and Pseudonocardia being the most prevalent (relative abundance > 10%) at the genus level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–829 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed endophyte Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson diversity indices did not differ significantly among the three varieties.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
BY1507, QQ446, and Teosintee0
Outcome
diversity indices (Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson)e0
Direction
No significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference was observed in diversity indices (Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson) of seed endophytes among BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Teosinte germinating-root endophytes had significantly higher Shannon and Simpson indices than the domesticated varieties.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Teosintee0
Organ / stage
germinating roote0
Outcome
Shannon and Simpson indicese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BY1507 and QQ446e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Shannon and Simpson indices for the germinating root endophyte from the wild variety (Teosinte) were significantly higher than the domesticated varieties (BY1507 and QQ446)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCoA showed notable overlap among the seed bacterial communities of the three maize varieties.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
BY1507, QQ446, and Teosintee0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
notable overlap in the endophytic bacterial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PCoA revealed a notable overlap in the endophytic bacterial communities from the seeds of BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed endophyte communities also formed clustering patterns.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
clustering patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yet, clustering patterns were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each maize variety shared over 30% of endophytic bacteria between seeds and germinating roots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
BY1507, QQ446, and Teosintee0
Organ / stage
seeds and germinating rootse0
Outcome
shared endophytic bacteriae0
Value
>30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BY1507, QQ446, and Teosinte share a notable proportion of shared endophytic bacteria (>30%) between the seeds and germinating roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑