Paper · 2024 · Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences Section B Natural Exact and Applied Sciences

Seasonal Dynamics of the Exotic Cherry Plum Aphid Brachycaudus Divaricatae (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae) on Prunus Cerasifera in Latvia, with Notes on Local Predators

Valentīna Petrova; Līga Jankevica; Arturs Stalažs

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Brachycaudus divaricatae Shaposhnikov has spread in many European countries over the last decades, where it causes intensive damage to Prunus cerasifera . Forty P. cerasifera trees were monitored in 2013 at Dārziņi, on the outskirts of Riga city (Latvia), to obtain data on seasonal dynamics of an exotic aphid species, B. divaricatae. Brachycaudus divaricatae was predominant on its only known host plant species, P. cerasifera . Other aphid species were found on monitored trees: Brachycaudus sp., Hyalopterus pruni (Geoffroy) and Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (L.). The target species, B. divaricatae was the most abundant, followed by H. pruni , but only B. divaricatae reached the highest infestation level. The latest date of registered B. divaricatae colonies was 31 October 2013. Many predatory arthropods belonging to Acari, Araneae, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Neuroptera were registered in B. divaricatae colonies. The most abundant predators were dipteran larvae from the families Cecidomyiidae and Syrphidae. Predatory dipterans most abundant were only at the beginning of the season (June). Later in the season, the number of spiders increased in aphid colonies, and of 365 spiders, 43.8% were members of the Linyphiidae family. Five ant species were caught in B. divaricatae colonies, and Formica cinerea Mayr was the most abundant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brachycaudus divaricatae was predominant on P. cerasifera.

Taxon
P. cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
Interactor
Brachycaudus divaricataeBrachycaudus divaricataee0pest
Outcome
Brachycaudus divaricatae was predominante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brachycaudus divaricatae was predominant on its only known host plant species, P. cerasifera .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brachycaudus sp., Hyalopterus pruni and Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae also occurred on the trees.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
Brachycaudus sp.Brachycauduse0pest
Outcome
Other aphid species were found on monitored treese0
Qualifier
Hyalopterus pruni (Geoffroy) and Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (L.)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brachycaudus
Brachycaudus · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Other aphid species were found on monitored trees: Brachycaudus sp., Hyalopterus pruni (Geoffroy) and Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. divaricatae was most abundant, followed by H. pruni, and alone reached the highest infestation level.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
B. divaricataeBrachycaudus divaricataee0pest
Outcome
infestation levele0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
H. prunie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The target species, B. divaricatae was the most abundant, followed by H. pruni , but only B. divaricatae reached the highest infestation level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–715 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. divaricatae colonies were recorded as late as 31 October 2013.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
B. divaricataeBrachycaudus divaricataee0pest
Outcome
latest date of registered B. divaricatae coloniese0
Value
31 October 2013e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The latest date of registered B. divaricatae colonies was 31 October 2013.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predatory arthropods from six orders occurred in aphid colonies.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
B. divaricataeBrachycaudus divaricataee0pest
Outcome
predatory arthropods belonging to Acari, Araneae, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Neuroptera were registerede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Many predatory arthropods belonging to Acari, Araneae, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Neuroptera were registered in B. divaricatae colonies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cecidomyiidae and Syrphidae larvae were the most abundant predators.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
CecidomyiidaeCecidomyiidaee0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
SyrphidaeSyrphidaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most abundant predatorse0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most abundant predators were dipteran larvae from the families Cecidomyiidae and Syrphidae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1034 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predatory dipterans were most abundant at the start of the season in June.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Outcome
Predatory dipteranse0
Direction
most abundante0
Qualifier
beginning of the season (June)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Predatory dipterans most abundant were only at the beginning of the season (June).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider numbers increased later in the season; 43.8% of 365 spiders were Linyphiidae.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
LinyphiidaeLinyphiidaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of spiderse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.8%e0
Qualifier
365 spiderse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Later in the season, the number of spiders increased in aphid colonies, and of 365 spiders, 43.8% were members of the Linyphiidae family.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five ant species occurred in aphid colonies, with Formica cinerea most abundant.

Taxon
Prunus CerasiferaPrunus cerasiferat0
Interactor
B. divaricataeBrachycaudus divaricataee0pest
Second interactor
Formica cinerea MayrFormica cinereae0other
Outcome
Five ant species were caughte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasifera · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Formica cinerea
Formica cinerea · Second interactorHectonichus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus Cerasifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Five ant species were caught in B. divaricatae colonies, and Formica cinerea Mayr was the most abundant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1360 · show in text ↑